Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeldre, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorReichle, Erik D.
dc.contributor.authorYu, Lili
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-26T02:55:14Z
dc.date.available2023-04-26T02:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31145
dc.description.abstractWord identification is slower and less accurate outside central vision, but the precise relationship between retinal eccentricity and lexical processing is not well specified by models of either word identification or reading. In a seminal eye-movement study, Rayner and Morrison (1981) found that participants made remarkably accurate naming and lexical-decision responses to words displayed more than three degrees from the center of vision—even under conditions requiring fixed gaze. However, the validity of these findings is challenged by a range of methodological limitations. We report a series of gaze-contingent lexical-decision and naming experiments that replicate and extend Rayner and Morrison’s study to provide a more accurate estimate of how visual constraints delimit lexical processing. Simulations were conducted using the E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al., 2012) to assess the implications for understanding eye-movement control during reading. Augmenting the model’s assumptions about the impact of both eccentricity and visual crowding on the rate of lexical processing provided good fits to the observed data without impairing the model’s ability to simulate benchmark eye-movement effects. The findings are discussed with a view towards the development of a complete model of reading.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Psychology: Generalen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjecteye movementsen
dc.subjectperceptual spanen
dc.subjectreadingen
dc.subjectretinal eccentricityen
dc.subjectword identificationen
dc.titleUnderstanding the visual constraints on lexical processing: New empirical and simulation resultsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::52 PSYCHOLOGY::5204 Cognitive and computational psychology::520405 Psycholinguistics (incl. speech production and comprehension)en
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::52 PSYCHOLOGY::5204 Cognitive and computational psychologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xge0001295
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
dc.relation.arcDP190100719
dc.rights.other©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at Journal of Experimental Psychology: Generalen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Science::School of Psychologyen
usyd.citation.volume152en
usyd.citation.issue3en
usyd.citation.spage693en
usyd.citation.epage722en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.