Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeldre, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorReichle, Erik D.
dc.contributor.authorYu, Lili
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-26T02:55:14Z
dc.date.available2023-04-26T02:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31145
dc.description.abstractWord identification is slower and less accurate outside central vision, but the precise relationship between retinal eccentricity and lexical processing is not well specified by models of either word identification or reading. In a seminal eye-movement study, Rayner and Morrison (1981) found that participants made remarkably accurate naming and lexical-decision responses to words displayed more than three degrees from the center of vision—even under conditions requiring fixed gaze. However, the validity of these findings is challenged by a range of methodological limitations. We report a series of gaze-contingent lexical-decision and naming experiments that replicate and extend Rayner and Morrison’s study to provide a more accurate estimate of how visual constraints delimit lexical processing. Simulations were conducted using the E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al., 2012) to assess the implications for understanding eye-movement control during reading. Augmenting the model’s assumptions about the impact of both eccentricity and visual crowding on the rate of lexical processing provided good fits to the observed data without impairing the model’s ability to simulate benchmark eye-movement effects. The findings are discussed with a view towards the development of a complete model of reading.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Psychology: Generalen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjecteye movementsen_AU
dc.subjectperceptual spanen_AU
dc.subjectreadingen_AU
dc.subjectretinal eccentricityen_AU
dc.subjectword identificationen_AU
dc.titleUnderstanding the visual constraints on lexical processing: New empirical and simulation resultsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::52 PSYCHOLOGY::5204 Cognitive and computational psychology::520405 Psycholinguistics (incl. speech production and comprehension)en_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::52 PSYCHOLOGY::5204 Cognitive and computational psychologyen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xge0001295
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.arcDP190100719
dc.rights.other©American Psychological Association, 2022. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at Journal of Experimental Psychology: Generalen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Science::School of Psychologyen_AU
usyd.citation.volume152en_AU
usyd.citation.issue3en_AU
usyd.citation.spage693en_AU
usyd.citation.epage722en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.