Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarle, Chelseaen
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Suzanneen
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Victoriaen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Deniseen
dc.contributor.authorEgger, Samen
dc.contributor.authorCaruana, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorHui, Harrieten
dc.contributor.authorYap, Sarshaen
dc.contributor.authorDeandrea, Silviaen
dc.contributor.authorOnyeka, Tonia Cen
dc.contributor.authorJzerman, Maarten J Ien
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Ophiraen
dc.contributor.authorBray, Freddieen
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Richarden
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, Ajayen
dc.contributor.authorPeacock, Stuart Jen
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kelvin K Wen
dc.contributor.authorHanna, Timothy Pen
dc.contributor.authorSoerjomataram, Isabelleen
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Dianne Len
dc.contributor.authorCanfell, Karenen
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Juliaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T00:45:41Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T00:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/28983
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The early COVID-19 literature suggested that people with cancer may be more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 or develop COVID-19 than people without cancer, due to increased health services contact and/or immunocompromise. While some studies were criticised due to small patient numbers and methodological limitations, they created or reinforced concerns of clinicians and people with cancer. These risks are also important in COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation decisions. We performed a systematic review to critically assess and summarise the early literature. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic search of Medline/Embase/BioRxiv/MedRxiv/SSRN databases including peer-reviewed journal articles, letters/commentaries, and non-peer-reviewed pre-print articles for 1 January-1 July 2020. The primary endpoints were diagnosis of COVID-19 and positive SARS-CoV-2 test. We assessed risk of bias using a tool adapted from the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Twelve studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. All four studies of COVID-19 incidence (including 24,181,727 individuals, 125,649 with pre-existing cancer) reported that people with cancer had higher COVID-19 incidence rates. Eight studies reported SARS-CoV-2 test positivity for >472,000 individuals, 48,370 with pre-existing cancer. Seven of these studies comparing people with any and without cancer, were pooled using random effects [pooled odds ratio 0.91, 95%CI:0.57-1.47; unadjusted for age, sex, or comorbidities]. Two studies suggested people with active or haematological cancer had lower risk of a positive test. All 12 studies had high risk of bias; none included universal or random COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: The early literature on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 for people with cancer is characterised by pervasive biases and limited data. To provide high-quality evidence to inform decision-making, studies of risk of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 for people with cancer should control for other potential modifiers of infection risk, including age, sex, comorbidities, exposure to the virus, protective measures taken, and vaccination, in addition to stratifying analyses by cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and treatment received.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleThe risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 or developing COVID-19 for people with cancer: a systematic review of the early evidence.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100338
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.