Limits in 2-Categories of Locally-Presentable Categories
Access status:
USyd Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Doctor of PhilosophyAuthor/s
Bird, Gregory J.Abstract
This thesis has its origins in responding to some unpublished work of Ulmer [26], [27], [28]. There, Ulmer proves that certain constructions on locally-presentable categories yield locally-presentable categories. Let C be a small category and T a set of cones in C. The category ...
See moreThis thesis has its origins in responding to some unpublished work of Ulmer [26], [27], [28]. There, Ulmer proves that certain constructions on locally-presentable categories yield locally-presentable categories. Let C be a small category and T a set of cones in C. The category [C,A] is the full subcategory of the functor category [C,A] given by those functors T such that each TY, where Y is in T* is a limit-cone. Gabriel and Ulmer [10] had already established that [C,A]j, is reflective in [C,A], and hence locally presentable, if A is locally presentable. The result about reflectivity was extended by Freyd and Kelly [9] to the case where A is a locally-bounded category and T is a (possibly) large set. Some results on the coreflectivity of subcategories determined by functors taking (inductive) cones to colimit-cones existed, but were unpublished, before the work of Ulmer. One major thrust of this work was to establish coreflectivity for the case of A being a locally-presentable category.
See less
See moreThis thesis has its origins in responding to some unpublished work of Ulmer [26], [27], [28]. There, Ulmer proves that certain constructions on locally-presentable categories yield locally-presentable categories. Let C be a small category and T a set of cones in C. The category [C,A] is the full subcategory of the functor category [C,A] given by those functors T such that each TY, where Y is in T* is a limit-cone. Gabriel and Ulmer [10] had already established that [C,A]j, is reflective in [C,A], and hence locally presentable, if A is locally presentable. The result about reflectivity was extended by Freyd and Kelly [9] to the case where A is a locally-bounded category and T is a (possibly) large set. Some results on the coreflectivity of subcategories determined by functors taking (inductive) cones to colimit-cones existed, but were unpublished, before the work of Ulmer. One major thrust of this work was to establish coreflectivity for the case of A being a locally-presentable category.
See less
Date
1984Rights statement
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
Faculty of ScienceDepartment, Discipline or Centre
The Department of Mathematical StatisticsAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare