Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlew, Terry
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T02:11:54Z
dc.date.available2022-06-23T02:11:54Z
dc.date.issued2022en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/28889
dc.description.abstractAs many of the world’s largest companies are platform-based technology companies, there has been a growing push worldwide to regulate these companies to address issues arising from economic, political and communications power. At the same time, their distinctive platform business models raise new challenges to regulators, such as what industries they are in, what problems connect to which regulatory authority, and who has jurisdictional authority and regulatory capacity. The paper argues that regulators increasingly need to “think like Google”: they need to be able to adopt holistic strategies that can apply across industry silos and different regulatory responsibilities. There is also a need to empower the notion of regulation in the public interest, to challenge the ideational power of tech companies that they are superior stewards of public good to government agencies.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherCompetition Policy Internationalen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofTechReg Chronicleen_AU
dc.subjectregulationen_AU
dc.subjectcompetitionen_AU
dc.subjectmultisided marketsen_AU
dc.subjectregulatory innovationen_AU
dc.subjectdigital platformsen_AU
dc.titleWhy tech regulators need to think like Googleen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc2001 Communication and Media Studiesen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.arcDP190100222
dc.rights.otherContent is proprietary, copyrighted works of CPI and its authors and comprises: (i) works of original authorship, including compiled Content containing CPI’s selection, arrangement and coordination, and expression of such Content or pre-existing material as it has created, gathered or assembled; and (ii) Content that has been created, developed and maintained by CPI or its authors at great expense, such that misappropriation or unauthorized use by others for commercial gain would unfairly and/or irreparably harm CPI and its authors or reduce CPI or its authors’ incentive to create, develop and maintain such content. Customer will not commit or permit any act or omission that would contest or impair CPI’s or any author’s proprietary and intellectual property rights to Content or that would cause the Content to infringe the proprietary or intellectual property rights of a third party. Customer will reproduce CPI’s or its authors’ copyright and proprietary rights legend on all copies of Content.en_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Literature, Art and Mediaen_AU
usyd.departmentDepartment of Media and Communicationen_AU
usyd.citation.issueJuneen_AU
usyd.citation.spage3en_AU
usyd.citation.epage7en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.