Reshaping wound care: Evaluation of an artificial intelligence app to improve wound assessment and management amid the COVID-19 pandemic
Type
ArticleAuthor/s
Barakat_Johnson, MichelleJones, Aaron
Burger, Mitch
Leong, Thomas
Frotjold, Astrid
Randall, Sue
Fethney, Judith
Coyer, Fiona
Abstract
Wound documentation is integral to effective wound care, health data coding and facilitating continuity of care. This study evaluated the usability and effectiveness of an artificial intelligence application for wound assessment and management from a clinician-and-patient user ...
See moreWound documentation is integral to effective wound care, health data coding and facilitating continuity of care. This study evaluated the usability and effectiveness of an artificial intelligence application for wound assessment and management from a clinician-and-patient user perspective. A quasi-experimental design was conducted in four settings in an Australian health service. Data were collected from patients in the standard group (n=166, 243 wounds) and intervention group (n=124, 184 wounds), at baseline and post-intervention. Clinicians participated in a survey (n=10) and focus group interviews (n=13) and patients were interviewed (n=4). Wound documentation data were analysed descriptively, and bivariate statistics were used to determine between-group differences. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted. Compared with the standard group, wound documentation in the intervention group improved significantly (more than two items documented 24% vs 70%, P
See less
See moreWound documentation is integral to effective wound care, health data coding and facilitating continuity of care. This study evaluated the usability and effectiveness of an artificial intelligence application for wound assessment and management from a clinician-and-patient user perspective. A quasi-experimental design was conducted in four settings in an Australian health service. Data were collected from patients in the standard group (n=166, 243 wounds) and intervention group (n=124, 184 wounds), at baseline and post-intervention. Clinicians participated in a survey (n=10) and focus group interviews (n=13) and patients were interviewed (n=4). Wound documentation data were analysed descriptively, and bivariate statistics were used to determine between-group differences. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted. Compared with the standard group, wound documentation in the intervention group improved significantly (more than two items documented 24% vs 70%, P
See less
Date
2022Funding information
New South Wales Department of Health
Licence
OtherFaculty/School
Faculty of Medicine and HealthShare