Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHewson, Emily
dc.contributor.authorDipuglia, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorKipritidis, John
dc.contributor.authorGe, Yuanyuan
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Ricky
dc.contributor.authorRoderick, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorBell, Linda
dc.contributor.authorPoulsen, Per
dc.contributor.authorEade, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorKeall, Paul
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Doan Trang
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T00:36:57Z
dc.date.available2022-03-22T00:36:57Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/27791
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Locally advanced and oligometastatic cancer patients require radiotherapy treatment to multiple independently moving targets. There is no existing commercial solution that can simultaneously track and treat multiple targets. This study experimentally implemented and evaluated a real-time multi-target tracking system for locally advanced prostate cancer. Methods: Real-time multi-target MLC tracking was integrated with 3D x-ray image guidance on a standard linac. Three locally advanced prostate cancer treatment plans were delivered to a static lymph node phantom and dynamic prostate phantom that reproduced three prostate trajectories. Treatments were delivered using multi-target MLC tracking, single-target MLC tracking, and no tracking. Doses were measured using Gafchromic film placed in the dynamic and static phantoms. Dosimetric error was quantified by the 2%/2 mm gamma failure rate. Geometric error was evaluated as the misalignment between target and aperture positions. The multi-target tracking system latency was measured. Results: The mean (range) gamma failure rates for the prostate and lymph nodes, were 18.6% (5.2%, 28.5%) and 7.5% (1.1%, 13.7%) with multi-target tracking, 7.9% (0.7%, 15.4%) and 37.8% (18.0%, 57.9%) with single-target tracking, and 38.1% (0.6%, 75.3%) and 37.2% (29%, 45.3%) without tracking. Multi-target tracking had the lowest geometric error with means and standard deviations within 0.2 ± 1.5 for the prostate and 0.0 ± 0.3 mm for the lymph nodes. The latency was 730 ± 20 ms. Conclusion: This study presented the first experimental implementation of multi-target tracking to independently track prostate and lymph node displacement during VMAT. Multi-target tracking reduced dosimetric and geometric errors compared to single-target tracking and no tracking.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofRadiotherapy & Oncologyen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectLocally advanced prostate canceren_AU
dc.subjectMLC trackingen_AU
dc.subjectMulti-target trackingen_AU
dc.subjectReal-time adaptive radiotherapyen_AU
dc.titleFirst experimental evaluation of multi-target multileaf collimator tracking during volumetric modulated arc therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc0299 Other Physical Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.001
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1194004
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentACRF Image X Instituteen_AU
usyd.citation.volume160en_AU
usyd.citation.spage212en_AU
usyd.citation.epage220en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.