Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVichitkunakorn, Polathep
dc.contributor.authorConigrave, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorGeater, Alan
dc.contributor.authorAssanangkornchai, Sawitri
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T02:53:03Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T02:53:03Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/27488
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32399600
dc.description.abstractA context-specific quantity-frequency (CSQF) questionnaire has been developed to accurately measure alcohol consumption using probing questions on drinking context. The study aimed to describe the drinking context associated with different drinking intensities in a community of southern Thailand using the CSQF. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults aged > 15 years in Songkhla Province, Thailand. Among 804 participants, there were 183 current drinkers with 412 drinking events (215 low-, 79 medium-, and 118 high-intensity). More than half of these events occurred in special situations (i.e., holiday, party, and cultural drinking). About half of the drinking events occurred outside the drinker’s house and most drinking events occurred among friends. Higher drinking intensity was associated with higher level of education [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.74 for medium- and aOR 5.23 for high-intensity] and with a special drinking situation (aOR 2.46 for medium- and aOR 2.78 for high-intensity).en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherSpringeren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Mental Health Journalen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectdrinking contexten_AU
dc.subjectdrinking behaviouren_AU
dc.subjectalcohol surveyen_AU
dc.titleA context-specific instrument to record drinking behaviour: A pilot study on implications of identifying the context of risky drinkingen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc11 Medical and Health Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10597-020-00629-0
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten_AU
dc.relation.nhmrcAPP1117582
dc.rights.otherThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature's AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00629-0en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentCentral Clinical Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume57en_AU
usyd.citation.issue1en_AU
usyd.citation.spage167en_AU
usyd.citation.epage177en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.