Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKates, Olivia S.en
dc.contributor.authorStock, Peter G.en
dc.contributor.authorIson, Michael G.en
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Richard D. M.en
dc.contributor.authorBurra, Patriziaen
dc.contributor.authorJeong, Jong Cheolen
dc.contributor.authorKute, Viveken
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Elmien
dc.contributor.authorNino_Murcia, Alejandroen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Haiboen
dc.contributor.authorWall, Anjien
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T05:05:00Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T05:05:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26993
dc.description.abstractTransplant centers seeking to increase coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine coverage may consider requiring vaccination for healthcare workers or for candidates. The authors summarize current data to inform an ethical analysis of the harms, benefits, and individual and societal impact of mandatory vaccination, concluding that vaccine requirements for healthcare workers and transplant candidates are ethically justified by beneficence, net utility, and fiduciary duty to patients and public health. Implementation strategies should mitigate concerns about respect for autonomy and transparency for both groups. We clarify how the same arguments might be applied to related questions of caregiver vaccination, allocation of other healthcare resources, and mandates for non-COVID-19 vaccines. Finally, we call for effort to achieve global equity in vaccination as soon as possible.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleEthical review of COVID-19 vaccination requirements for transplant center staff and patientsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajt.16878
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.