Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorViner, Russellen
dc.contributor.authorWaddington, Claireen
dc.contributor.authorMytton, Oliveren
dc.contributor.authorBooy, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorLadhani, Shamezen
dc.contributor.authorPanovska-Griffiths, Jasminaen
dc.contributor.authorBonell, Chrisen
dc.contributor.authorMelendez-Torres, G. J.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T02:28:21Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T02:28:21Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26574
dc.description.abstractBackground: The role of children and young people (CYP) in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in household and educational settings remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of contact-tracing and population-based studies at low risk of bias. Methods: We searched 4 electronic databases on 5 April for contact-tracing studies and population-based studies informative about transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from 0-19 year olds in household or educational settings. We excluded studies at high risk of bias, including from under-ascertainment of asymptomatic infections. We undertook multilevel random effects meta-analyses of secondary attack rates (SAR: contact-tracing studies) and school infection prevalence, and used meta-regression to examine the impact of community SARS-CoV-2 incidence, mitigations and attendance on school infection prevalence. Findings: 4179 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in 37 included studies (17 contact-tracing; 18 population studies; 2 mixed studies). The pooled relative transmissibility of CYP compared with adults was 1.00 (0.73, 1.37) in adjusted household studies. The pooled SAR from 0CYP was significantly lower in school studies (0.5% (0.1, 1.6) than household studies (7.3% (2.5, 21.8) - p<0.0001. There was no difference in SAR from CYP to child or adult contacts. School population studies showed little evidence of clustering in classes within schools. School infection prevalence was associated with contemporary community 14-day incidence (OR 1.003 (1.001, 1.004), p<0.001) but not with school attendance rate. Interpretation: We found no difference in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from CYP compared with adults within household settings. SAR were markedly lower in school compared with household settings, suggesting that household transmission is more important than school transmission in this pandemic. School infection prevalence was associated with community infection incidence, supporting hypotheses that school infections broadly reflect community infections. These findings are important for guiding policy decisions on shielding, vaccination school operations during the pandemic. Funding Information: No funding obtained.Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no competing interests.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleTransmission of SARS-CoV-2 by Children and Young People in Households and Schools: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based and Contact-Tracing Studiesen
dc.typePreprinten
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.3883209
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.