Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, B
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, T
dc.contributor.authorWallis, A
dc.contributor.authorSmith, S
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, A
dc.contributor.authorKeall, P
dc.contributor.authorSonke, JJ
dc.contributor.authorVinod, S
dc.contributor.authorDillon, O
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, R
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T23:02:56Z
dc.date.available2021-09-23T23:02:56Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26223
dc.description.abstractConventional 4DCBCT captures 1320 projections across 4 min. Adaptive 4DCBCT has been developed to reduce imaging dose and scan time. This study investigated reconstruction algorithms that best complement adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition for reducing imaging dose and scan time whilst maintaining or improving image quality compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition using real patient data from the first 10 adaptive 4DCBCT patients. Adaptive 4DCBCT was implemented in the ADaptive CT Acquisition for Personalized Thoracic imaging clinical trial. Adaptive 4DCBCT modulates gantry rotation speed and kV acquisition rate in response to the patient's real-time respiratory signal, ensuring even angular spacing between projections at each respiratory phase. We examined the first 10 lung cancer radiotherapy patients that received adaptive 4DCBCT. Fast, 200-projection scans over 60-80 s, and slower, 600-projection scans over ∼240 s, were obtained after routine patient treatment and compared against conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Adaptive 4DCBCT acquisitions were reconstructed using Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), McKinnon-Bates (MKB), Motion Compensated FDK (MCFDK) and Motion Compensated MKB (MCMKB) algorithms. Reconstructions were assessed via, Structural SIMilarity (SSIM), Signal-to-Noise-Ratio (SNR), Contrast-to-Noise-Ratio (CNR), Tissue Interface Sharpness of Diaphragm (TIS-D) and Tumor (TIS-T). The 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT acquisition corresponded to 85% and 55% reduction in imaging dose, shorter and similar scan times of approximately 90 s and 236 s respectively, compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. 200- and 600-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved more than 0.900 SSIM relative to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition. Compared to conventional 4DCBCT acquisition, 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT reconstructions achieved higher SNR, CNR, TIS-T, TIS-D with motion compensated algorithms, MCFDK (208%, 159%, 174%, 247%) and MCMKB (214%, 173%, 266%, 245%) respectively. The 200-projection adaptive 4DCBCT MCFDK- and MCMKB-reconstruction results show image quality improvements are possible even with 85% fewer projections acquired. We established acquisition-reconstruction protocols that provide substantial reductions in imaging time and dose whilst improving image quality.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherIOP Sciencesen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofPhysics in Medicine & Biologyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectimaging protocolsen_AU
dc.subjectradiotherapyen_AU
dc.subjectreconstructionen_AU
dc.titleReducing 4DCBCT scan time and dose through motion compensated acquisition and reconstruction.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc0299 Other Physical Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/abebfb
dc.relation.nhmrc1112096
dc.relation.nhmrc1138899
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentACRF Image X Instituteen_AU
usyd.citation.volume66en_AU
usyd.citation.issue7en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.