Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, J
dc.contributor.authorSmith, A
dc.contributor.authorSidhom, M
dc.contributor.authorRai, R
dc.contributor.authorLiney, G
dc.contributor.authorDowling, J
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, P
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, L
dc.contributor.authorKeall, P
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T14:13:04Z
dc.date.available2021-09-23T14:13:04Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26218
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Recent advances in image guidance and adaptive radiotherapy could enable gantry-free radiotherapy using patient rotation. Gantry-free radiotherapy could substantially reduce the cost of radiotherapy systems and facilities. MRI guidance complements a gantry-free approach because of its ability to visualise soft tissue deformation during rotation. A potential barrier to gantry-free radiotherapy is patient acceptability, especially when combined with MRI. This study investigates human experiences of horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner. Methods: Ten healthy human participants and nine participants previously treated with radiotherapy were rotated within an MRI scanner. Participants' anxiety and motion sickness was assessed before being rotated in 45-degree increments and paused, representing a multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment. An MR image was acquired at each 45-degree angle. Following imaging, anxiety and motion sickness were re-assessed, followed by a comfort questionnaire and exit interview. The significance of the differences in anxiety and motion sickness pre- versus post-imaging was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Content analysis was performed on exit interview transcripts. Results: Eight of ten healthy and eight of nine patient participants completed the imaging session. Mean anxiety scores before and after imaging were 7.9/100 and 11.8/100, respectively (P = 0.26), and mean motion sickness scores were 5.3/100 and 13.7/100, respectively (P = 0.02). Most participants indicated likely acceptance of rotation if MRI were to be used in a hypothetical treatment. Physical discomfort was reported to be the biggest concern. Conclusions: Horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner was acceptable for most (17/19) participants.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncologyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectpatient rotationen_AU
dc.subjectradiation therapyen_AU
dc.titleMeasurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry-free radiation therapy.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc0299 Other Physical Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1754-9485.13130
dc.relation.nhmrc1132471
dc.relation.nhmrc1112096
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
usyd.departmentACRF Image X Instituteen_AU
usyd.citation.volume65en_AU
usyd.citation.issue1en_AU
usyd.citation.spage112en_AU
usyd.citation.epage119en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.