Measurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry-free radiation therapy.
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Buckley, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Sidhom, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Rai, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Liney, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Dowling, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Metcalfe, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Holloway, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Keall, P | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-23T14:13:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-23T14:13:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/26218 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Recent advances in image guidance and adaptive radiotherapy could enable gantry-free radiotherapy using patient rotation. Gantry-free radiotherapy could substantially reduce the cost of radiotherapy systems and facilities. MRI guidance complements a gantry-free approach because of its ability to visualise soft tissue deformation during rotation. A potential barrier to gantry-free radiotherapy is patient acceptability, especially when combined with MRI. This study investigates human experiences of horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner. Methods: Ten healthy human participants and nine participants previously treated with radiotherapy were rotated within an MRI scanner. Participants' anxiety and motion sickness was assessed before being rotated in 45-degree increments and paused, representing a multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment. An MR image was acquired at each 45-degree angle. Following imaging, anxiety and motion sickness were re-assessed, followed by a comfort questionnaire and exit interview. The significance of the differences in anxiety and motion sickness pre- versus post-imaging was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Content analysis was performed on exit interview transcripts. Results: Eight of ten healthy and eight of nine patient participants completed the imaging session. Mean anxiety scores before and after imaging were 7.9/100 and 11.8/100, respectively (P = 0.26), and mean motion sickness scores were 5.3/100 and 13.7/100, respectively (P = 0.02). Most participants indicated likely acceptance of rotation if MRI were to be used in a hypothetical treatment. Physical discomfort was reported to be the biggest concern. Conclusions: Horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner was acceptable for most (17/19) participants. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | patient rotation | en_AU |
dc.subject | radiation therapy | en_AU |
dc.title | Measurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry-free radiation therapy. | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 0299 Other Physical Sciences | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1754-9485.13130 | |
dc.relation.nhmrc | 1132471 | |
dc.relation.nhmrc | 1112096 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health | en_AU |
usyd.department | ACRF Image X Institute | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 65 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 1 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 112 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 119 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | No | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections