Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Ashwinen
dc.contributor.authorPonnapa Reddy, Mallikarjunaen
dc.contributor.authorKadam, Umeshen
dc.contributor.authorZubarev, Alexanderen
dc.contributor.authorLim, Zhengen
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Chrisen
dc.contributor.authorBihari, Shaileshen
dc.contributor.authorHaji, Jumanaen
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jinghangen
dc.contributor.authorMitra, Saikaten
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan, Kollengodeen
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Arvinden
dc.contributor.authorRubulotta, Francescaen
dc.contributor.authorSvensk, Eriken
dc.contributor.authorShekar, Kiranen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T22:00:36Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T22:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26095
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines on infection control strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are incomprehensive and/or ambiguous may compromise HCWs' safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection control strategies in HCWs based on the guidelines published early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND OUTCOMES: A three-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was performed. The tool was validated by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific, and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income. RESULTS: Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The Delphi panel recommended an ideal infection control guideline should encompass six domains: general characteristics (domain 1), engineering recommendations (domain 2), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (domain 3), and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection control. The appraisal tool performed well across the six domains, and the inter-rater agreement was excellent for the 40 guidelines. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 than in domains 4-6, and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries. CONCLUSION: The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Engineering recommendations aspects of infection control, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use, and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection control guidelines during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen
dc.subject.asrc11 Medical and Health Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.