Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Ashwinen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPonnapa Reddy, Mallikarjunaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorKadam, Umeshen_AU
dc.contributor.authorZubarev, Alexanderen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLim, Zhengen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Chrisen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBihari, Shaileshen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHaji, Jumanaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jinghangen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMitra, Saikaten_AU
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan, Kollengodeen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Arvinden_AU
dc.contributor.authorRubulotta, Francescaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSvensk, Eriken_AU
dc.contributor.authorShekar, Kiranen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T22:00:36Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T22:00:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/26095
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines on infection control strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are incomprehensive and/or ambiguous may compromise HCWs' safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection control strategies in HCWs based on the guidelines published early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND OUTCOMES: A three-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was performed. The tool was validated by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific, and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income. RESULTS: Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The Delphi panel recommended an ideal infection control guideline should encompass six domains: general characteristics (domain 1), engineering recommendations (domain 2), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (domain 3), and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection control. The appraisal tool performed well across the six domains, and the inter-rater agreement was excellent for the 40 guidelines. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 than in domains 4-6, and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries. CONCLUSION: The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Engineering recommendations aspects of infection control, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use, and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection control guidelines during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workersen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Servicesen_AU
dc.subject.asrc11 Medical and Health Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.