Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLane, Courtney Ren_AU
dc.contributor.authorSherry, Norelle Len_AU
dc.contributor.authorPorter, Ashleigh Fen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDuchene, Sebastianen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHoran, Kristyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAndersson, Patiyanen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWilmot, Mathildaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Annabelleen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDougall, Sallyen_AU
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Sandra Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSait, Michelleen_AU
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves da Silva, Andersen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Susan Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHoang, Tuyeten_AU
dc.contributor.authorStinear, Timothy Pen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCaly, Leonen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSintchenko, Vitalien_AU
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Rikkien_AU
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Jamieen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Daviden_AU
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Lex Exen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMeumann, Ella Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorCooley, Louiseen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSchwessinger, Benjaminen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRawlinson, Williamen_AU
dc.contributor.authorvan Hal, Sebastiaan Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorStephens, Nicolaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCatton, Mikeen_AU
dc.contributor.authorLooker, Clareen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCrouch, Simonen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Bretten_AU
dc.contributor.authorAlpren, Charlesen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Deborah Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSeemann, Torstenen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHowden, Benjamin Pen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-22T22:38:58Z
dc.date.available2021-07-22T22:38:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25741
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A cornerstone of Australia's ability to control COVID-19 has been effective border control with an extensive supervised quarantine programme. However, a rapid recrudescence of COVID-19 was observed in the state of Victoria in June, 2020. We aim to describe the genomic findings that located the source of this second wave and show the role of genomic epidemiology in the successful elimination of COVID-19 for a second time in Australia. METHODS: In this observational, genomic epidemiological study, we did genomic sequencing of all laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 diagnosed in Victoria, Australia between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021. We did phylogenetic analyses, genomic cluster discovery, and integrated results with epidemiological data (detailed information on demographics, risk factors, and exposure) collected via interview by the Victorian Government Department of Health. Genomic transmission networks were used to group multiple genomic clusters when epidemiological and genomic data suggested they arose from a single importation event and diversified within Victoria. To identify transmission of emergent lineages between Victoria and other states or territories in Australia, all publicly available SARS-CoV-2 sequences uploaded before Feb 11, 2021, were obtained from the national sequence sharing programme AusTrakka, and epidemiological data were obtained from the submitting laboratories. We did phylodynamic analyses to estimate the growth rate, doubling time, and number of days from the first local infection to the collection of the first sequenced genome for the dominant local cluster, and compared our growth estimates to previously published estimates from a similar growth phase of lineage B.1.1.7 (also known as the Alpha variant) in the UK. FINDINGS: Between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021, there were 20 451 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia, of which 15 431 were submitted for sequencing, and 11 711 met all quality control metrics and were included in our analysis. We identified 595 genomic clusters, with a median of five cases per cluster (IQR 2-11). Overall, samples from 11 503 (98.2%) of 11 711 cases clustered with another sample in Victoria, either within a genomic cluster or transmission network. Genomic analysis revealed that 10 426 cases, including 10 416 (98.4%) of 10 584 locally acquired cases, diagnosed during the second wave (between June and October, 2020) were derived from a single incursion from hotel quarantine, with the outbreak lineage (transmission network G, lineage D.2) rapidly detected in other Australian states and territories. Phylodynamic analyses indicated that the epidemic growth rate of the outbreak lineage in Victoria during the initial growth phase (samples collected between June 4 and July 9, 2020; 47.4 putative transmission events, per branch, per year [1/years; 95% credible interval 26.0-85.0]), was similar to that of other reported variants, such as B.1.1.7 in the UK (mean approximately 71.5 1/years). Strict interventions were implemented, and the outbreak lineage has not been detected in Australia since Oct 29, 2020. Subsequent cases represented independent international or interstate introductions, with limited local spread. INTERPRETATION: Our study highlights how rapid escalation of clonal outbreaks can occur from a single incursion. However, strict quarantine measures and decisive public health responses to emergent cases are effective, even with high epidemic growth rates. Real-time genomic surveillance can alter the way in which public health agencies view and respond to COVID-19 outbreaks. FUNDING: The Victorian Government, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the Medical Research Future Fund.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleGenomics-informed responses in the elimination of COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia: an observational, genomic epidemiological study.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00133-X


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.