Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeher, Shireen
dc.contributor.authorDuley, Lelia
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-19T02:30:34Z
dc.date.available2021-07-19T02:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25715
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The optimum time for commencing antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of preeclampsia and its complications is unclear. Aggregate data meta-analyses suggest that aspirin is more effective if given prior to 16 weeks' gestation, but data are limited because of an inability to place women in the correct gestational age subgroup from relevant trials. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to use the large existing individual participant data set from the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies Collaboration to assess whether the treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications vary based on whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of individual participant data including 32,217 women and 32,819 babies recruited to 31 randomized trials comparing low-dose aspirin or other antiplatelet agents with placebo or no treatment for the prevention of preeclampsia has been published previously. Using this existing data set, we performed a prespecified subgroup analysis based on gestation at randomization to antiplatelet agents before 16 weeks, compared with at or after 16 weeks, for 4 of the main outcomes prespecified in the Perinatal Antiplatelet Review of International Studies protocol: preeclampsia, death of baby, preterm birth before 34 weeks, and small-for-gestational-age baby. Individual participant data for the subgroups were combined in a meta-analysis using RevMan software. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. The chi(2) test for interaction was used to assess statistically significant (P<.05) differences in treatment effect between subgroups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the effects of antiplatelet therapy for women randomized before 16 weeks' gestation compared with those randomized at or after 16 weeks for any of the 4 prespecified outcomes: preeclampsia, relative risk, 0.90, (95% confidence interval, 0.79e1.03; 17 trials, 9241 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.98; 22 trials, 21,429 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.98); death of baby, relative risk, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.09; 15 trials, 8626 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.07; 21 trials, 22,336 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.80); preterm birth prior to 34 weeks, relative risk, 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.04; 19 trials, 9155 women) for <16 weeks and relative risk, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.00; 25 trials, 22,117 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.91); and small-for-gestational-age baby, relative risk, 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.94; 13 trials, 6393 women) for<16 weeks and relative risk, 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.08; 18 trials, 14,996 women) for >= 16 weeks (interaction test, P=.08). CONCLUSION: The effect of low-dose aspirin and other antiplatelet agents on preeclampsia and its complications is consistent, regardless of whether treatment is started before or after 16 weeks' gestation. Women at an increased risk of preeclampsia should be offered antiplatelet therapy, regardless of whether they are first seen before or after 16 weeks' gestation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologyen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectantiplatletsen
dc.subjectaspirinen
dc.subjectgestationen
dc.subjectpreeclampsiaen
dc.subjectpreventionen
dc.titleAntiplatelet therapy before or after 16 weeks' gestation for preventing preeclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicineen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.016
dc.relation.otherUK Research & Innovation (UKRI) Medical Research Council UK (MRC) European Commission G116/98
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen
usyd.citation.volume216en
usyd.citation.issue2en
usyd.citation.spage121en
usyd.citation.epage128en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.