Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Anna Lene
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Kylie E
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Brittany J
dc.contributor.authorEkambareshwar, Mahalakshmi
dc.contributor.authorTaki, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorMauch, Chelsea E
dc.contributor.authorMihrshahi, Seema
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Karen J
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Lynne
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Rachael W
dc.contributor.authorWen, Li M
dc.contributor.authorByrne, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Julie
dc.contributor.authorPerlstein, Robyn
dc.contributor.authorWardle, Karen
dc.contributor.authorGolley, Rebecca K
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-19T02:24:53Z
dc.date.available2021-07-19T02:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.issn2047-6310
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25713
dc.description.abstractBackground Childhood obesity is a global problem. Early obesity prevention interventions are complex and differ in effectiveness. Novel frameworks, taxonomies and experience from the Early Prevention of Obesity in CHildren (EPOCH) trials were applied to unpack interventions. Objectives Deconstruct interventions into their components (target behaviours, delivery features and behaviour change techniques [BCTs]). Identify lessons learned and future recommendations for intervention planning, delivery, evaluation and implementation. Methods This multi-methods study deconstructed the four EPOCH interventions into target behaviours, delivery features and BCTs from unpublished and published materials using systematic frameworks. Additionally, semi-structured interviews were conducted with intervention facilitators and principal investigators. Results Each trial targeted between 10 and 14 obesity-related behaviours. Key variations in delivery features related to intensity, delivery mode and tailoring. BCTs consistently used across trials included goal-setting, social support, shaping knowledge, role-modelling and credible source. Recommendations from interview analyses include the importance of stakeholder collaboration and consideration of implementation throughout the study process. Conclusions The combination of frameworks, methodologies and interviews used in this study is a major step towards understanding complex early obesity prevention interventions. Future work will link systematic intervention deconstruction with quantitative models to identify which intervention components are most effective and for whom.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofPediatric Obesityen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectbehaviour change techniquesen_AU
dc.subjectchildhood obesityen_AU
dc.subjectearly preventionen_AU
dc.subjectobesityen_AU
dc.subjectprospective meta-analysisen_AU
dc.titleUnderstanding, comparing and learning from the four EPOCH early childhood obesity prevention interventions: A multi-methods studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicineen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ijpo.12679
dc.relation.nhmrc1028555
dc.relation.nhmrc1101675
dc.relation.otherMeat and Livestock Australia QUT2010001469
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
usyd.citation.volume15en_AU
usyd.citation.issue11en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.