Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkada, Malien
dc.contributor.authorWong, Tien Yinen
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorEldem, Boraen
dc.contributor.authorTalks, S. Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorAslam, Tariqen
dc.contributor.authorDaien, Vincenten
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Francisco J.en
dc.contributor.authorGale, Richarden
dc.contributor.authorBarratt, Janeen
dc.contributor.authorFinger, Robert P.en
dc.contributor.authorLoewenstein, Anaten
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T23:34:28Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T23:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25636
dc.description.abstractImportance: Poor adherence or persistence to treatment can be a barrier to optimizing clinical practice (real-world) outcomes to intravitreal injection therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and classification of adherence specific to this context. Objective: To describe the development and validation of terminology on patient nonadherence and nonpersistence to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Following a systematic review of currently used terminology in the literature, a subcommittee panel of retinal experts developed a set of definitions and classification for validation. Definitions were restricted to use in patients with nAMD requiring intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Validation by the full nAMD Barometer Leadership Coalition was established using a modified Delphi approach, with predetermined mean scores of 7.5 or more signifying consensus. Subsequent endorsement of the definitions was provided from a second set of retinal experts, with more than 50% members agreeing or strongly agreeing with all definitions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development of consensus definitions for the terms adherence and persistence and a classification system for the factors associated with treatment nonadherence or nonpersistence in patients with nAMD. Results: Nonadherence was defined as missing 2 or more treatment or monitoring visits over a period of 12 months, with a visit considered missed if it exceeded more than 2 weeks from the recommended date. Nonpersistence was defined by nonattendance or an appointment not scheduled within the last 6 months. The additional terms planned discontinuation and transfer of care were also established. Reasons for treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence were classified into 6 dimensions: (1) patient associated, (2) condition associated, (3) therapy associated, (4) health system and health care team associated, (5) social/economic, and (6) other, with subcategories specific to treatment for nAMD. Conclusions and Relevance: This classification system provides a framework for assessing treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence over time and across different health settings in the treatment of nAMD with current intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments. This may have additional importance, given the potential association of the coronavirus pandemic on adherence to treatment in patients with nAMD.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleDefining Nonadherence and Nonpersistence to Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degenerationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1660
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.