Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkada, Malien_AU
dc.contributor.authorWong, Tien Yinen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Paulen_AU
dc.contributor.authorEldem, Boraen_AU
dc.contributor.authorTalks, S. Jamesen_AU
dc.contributor.authorAslam, Tariqen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDaien, Vincenten_AU
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Francisco J.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorGale, Richarden_AU
dc.contributor.authorBarratt, Janeen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFinger, Robert P.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorLoewenstein, Anaten_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T23:34:28Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T23:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25636
dc.description.abstractImportance: Poor adherence or persistence to treatment can be a barrier to optimizing clinical practice (real-world) outcomes to intravitreal injection therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and classification of adherence specific to this context. Objective: To describe the development and validation of terminology on patient nonadherence and nonpersistence to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Following a systematic review of currently used terminology in the literature, a subcommittee panel of retinal experts developed a set of definitions and classification for validation. Definitions were restricted to use in patients with nAMD requiring intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Validation by the full nAMD Barometer Leadership Coalition was established using a modified Delphi approach, with predetermined mean scores of 7.5 or more signifying consensus. Subsequent endorsement of the definitions was provided from a second set of retinal experts, with more than 50% members agreeing or strongly agreeing with all definitions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development of consensus definitions for the terms adherence and persistence and a classification system for the factors associated with treatment nonadherence or nonpersistence in patients with nAMD. Results: Nonadherence was defined as missing 2 or more treatment or monitoring visits over a period of 12 months, with a visit considered missed if it exceeded more than 2 weeks from the recommended date. Nonpersistence was defined by nonattendance or an appointment not scheduled within the last 6 months. The additional terms planned discontinuation and transfer of care were also established. Reasons for treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence were classified into 6 dimensions: (1) patient associated, (2) condition associated, (3) therapy associated, (4) health system and health care team associated, (5) social/economic, and (6) other, with subcategories specific to treatment for nAMD. Conclusions and Relevance: This classification system provides a framework for assessing treatment nonadherence and nonpersistence over time and across different health settings in the treatment of nAMD with current intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments. This may have additional importance, given the potential association of the coronavirus pandemic on adherence to treatment in patients with nAMD.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleDefining Nonadherence and Nonpersistence to Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degenerationen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1660


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.