Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPienaar, Kiran
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Dean
dc.contributor.authorRace, Kane
dc.contributor.authorLea, Toby
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T05:19:30Z
dc.date.available2021-06-21T05:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2018en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25471
dc.description.abstractIt is well-established that a high prevalence of substance use is found in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) populations; a finding that researchers attribute to the stigmatised status of non-normative sexual and gender expression, and the role of illicit drug use in the collective production of socio-sexual pleasures, expressivity and disclosure in LGBTIQ communities. Despite the connections between sexual experimentation and substance use, LGBTIQ consumption practices have rarely received the attention they deserve within the alcohol and other drug (AOD) field. In this paper, we draw on concepts from post-structuralist policy analysis to analyse how AOD consumption among sexual and gender minorities is constituted in the policies of three Australian LGBTIQ health organisations. Following Carol Bacchi’s (2009, p. xi) observation that we are “governed through problematisations rather than policies”, we consider how substance use in LGBTIQ populations has been formulated as a policy problem requiring intervention. Doing so allows us to identify the normative assumptions about minority sexual and gender identities that underpin dominant problematisations of LGBTIQ substance use. These include: a) high rates of AOD use in LGBTIQ populations constitute problems in and of themselves, regardless of individual patterns of use; b) LGBTIQ people are a vulnerable population with specialised needs; and c) sexualised drug use is associated with “disinhibition” and a range of risks (including HIV transmission, drug dependence and mental health issues). Addressing the implications of these assumptions for how LGBTIQ communities are governed, we suggest that problematisation is an embodied, situated process, and that there is much to be gained by reframing dominant problematisations of AOD consumption so that this process is better informed by the inventive practices of LGBTIQ consumers themselves.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Drug Policyen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectLGBTIQ alcohol and other drug useen_AU
dc.titleProblematising LGBTIQ drug use, governing sexuality and gender: A critical analysis of LGBTIQ health policy in Australiaen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc2002 Cultural Studiesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.01.008
dc.relation.arcDP170101373
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiryen_AU
usyd.departmentDepartment of Gender and Cultural Studiesen_AU
usyd.citation.volume55en_AU
usyd.citation.spage187en_AU
usyd.citation.epage194en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.