Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Anthony C.en
dc.contributor.authorMouncey, Paul R.en
dc.contributor.authorAl-Beidh, Farahen
dc.contributor.authorRowan, Kathryn M.en
dc.contributor.authorNichol, Alistair D.en
dc.contributor.authorArabi, Yaseen M.en
dc.contributor.authorAnnane, Djillalien
dc.contributor.authorBeane, Abien
dc.contributor.authorvan Bentum-Puijk, Wilmaen
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Lindsay R.en
dc.contributor.authorBhimani, Zahraen
dc.contributor.authorBonten, Marc J.M.en
dc.contributor.authorBradbury, Charlotte A.en
dc.contributor.authorBrunkhorst, Frank M.en
dc.contributor.authorBuzgau, Adrianen
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Allen C.en
dc.contributor.authorDetry, Michelle A.en
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Eamon J.en
dc.contributor.authorEstcourt, Lise J.en
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Marken
dc.contributor.authorGoossens, Hermanen
dc.contributor.authorHaniffa, Rashanen
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Alisa M.en
dc.contributor.authorHills, Thomas E.en
dc.contributor.authorHorvat, Christopher M.en
dc.contributor.authorLamontagne, Francoisen
dc.contributor.authorLawler, Patrick R.en
dc.contributor.authorLeavis, Helen L.en
dc.contributor.authorLinstrum, Kelsey M.en
dc.contributor.authorLitton, Edwarden
dc.contributor.authorLorenzi, Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, John C.en
dc.contributor.authorMayr, Florian B.en
dc.contributor.authorMcAuley, Dannyen
dc.contributor.authorMcGlothlin, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorMcGuinness, Shay Pen
dc.contributor.authorMcVerry, Bryan J.en
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Stephanie K.en
dc.contributor.authorMorpeth, Susan C.en
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, Srinivasen
dc.contributor.authorOrr, Katrinaen
dc.contributor.authorParke, Rachael L.en
dc.contributor.authorParker, Jane C.en
dc.contributor.authorPatanwala, Asad E.en
dc.contributor.authorPettilä, Villeen
dc.contributor.authorRademaker, Emmaen
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Marlene S.en
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Christina T.en
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Christopher W.en
dc.contributor.authorShankar-Hari, Manuen
dc.contributor.authorSligl, Wendy I.en
dc.contributor.authorTurgeon, Alexis F.en
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Anne M.en
dc.contributor.authorvan de Veerdonk, Frank L.en
dc.contributor.authorZarychanski, Ryanen
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Cameronen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Roger J.en
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Derek C.en
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, Colin J.en
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Scotten
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Steve A.en
dc.contributor.authorDerde, Lennie P.G.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-02T04:55:13Z
dc.date.available2021-06-02T04:55:13Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25272
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background The efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is unclear. Methods We evaluated tocilizumab and sarilumab in an ongoing international, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial. Adult patients with Covid-19, within 24 hours of commencing organ support in an intensive care unit, were randomized to receive either tocilizumab (8mg/kg) or sarilumab (400mg) or standard care (control). The primary outcome was an ordinal scale combining in-hospital mortality (assigned −1) and days free of organ support to day 21. The trial uses a Bayesian statistical model with pre-defined triggers to declare superiority, efficacy, equivalence or futility. Results Tocilizumab and sarilumab both met the pre-defined triggers for efficacy. At the time of full analysis 353 patients had been assigned to tocilizumab, 48 to sarilumab and 402 to control. Median organ support-free days were 10 (interquartile range [IQR] −1, 16), 11 (IQR 0, 16) and 0 (IQR −1, 15) for tocilizumab, sarilumab and control, respectively. Relative to control, median adjusted odds ratios were 1.64 (95% credible intervals [CrI] 1.25, 2.14) for tocilizumab and 1.76 (95%CrI 1.17, 2.91) for sarilumab, yielding >99.9% and 99.5% posterior probabilities of superiority compared with control. Hospital mortality was 28.0% (98/350) for tocilizumab, 22.2% (10/45) for sarilumab and 35.8% (142/397) for control. All secondary outcomes and analyses supported efficacy of these IL-6 receptor antagonists. Conclusions In critically ill patients with Covid-19 receiving organ support in intensive care, treatment with the IL-6 receptor antagonists, tocilizumab and sarilumab, improved outcome, including survival. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02735707 )en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleInterleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19 – Preliminary reporten
dc.typePreprinten
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2021.01.07.21249390
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.