Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTennant, Elaineen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFigtree, Melanieen_AU
dc.contributor.authorTallon, Joen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBull, Rowena Aen_AU
dc.contributor.authorYeang, Malinnaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorDeveson, Ira Wen_AU
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, James Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorAdikari, Thirunien_AU
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Edward C.en_AU
dc.contributor.authorVan Hal, Sebastiaanen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHammond, Jillian Men_AU
dc.contributor.authorStevanovski, Igoren_AU
dc.contributor.authorMitsakos, Katerinaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHilditch-Roberts, Drewen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRawlinson, Williamen_AU
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Bernarden_AU
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-02T04:55:00Z
dc.date.available2021-06-02T04:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/25220
dc.description.abstractAbstract Australia’s early COVID-19 experience involved clusters in northern Sydney, including hospital and aged-care facility (ACF) outbreaks. We explore transmission dynamics, drivers and outcomes of a metropolitan hospital COVID-19 outbreak that occurred in the context of established local community transmission. A retrospective cohort analysis is presented, with integration of viral genome sequencing, clinical and epidemiological data. We demonstrate using genomic epidemiology that the hospital outbreak (n=23) was linked to a concurrent outbreak at a local aged care facility, but was phylogenetically distinct from other community clusters. Thirty day survival was 50% for hospitalised patients (an elderly cohort with significant comorbidities) and 100% for staff. Staff who acquired infection were unable to attend work for a median of 26.5 days (range 14-191); an additional 140 staff were furloughed for quarantine. Transmission from index cases showed a wide dispersion (mean 3.5 persons infected for every patient case and 0.6 persons infected for every staff case). One patient, who received regular nebulised medication prior to their diagnosis being known, acted as an apparent superspreader. No secondary transmissions occurred from isolated cases or contacts who were quarantined prior to becoming infectious. This analysis elaborates the wide-ranging impacts on patients and staff of nosocomial COVID-19 transmission and highlights the utility of genomic analysis as an adjunct to traditional epidemiological investigations. Delayed case recognition resulted in nosocomial transmission but once recognised, prompt action by the outbreak management team and isolation with contact and droplet (without airborne) precautions were sufficient to prevent transmission within this cohort. Our findings support current PPE recommendations in Australia but demonstrate the risk of administering nebulised medications when COVID-19 is circulating locally.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleEpidemiological and Genomic analysis of a Sydney Hospital COVID-19 Outbreaken_AU
dc.typePreprinten_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2021.02.17.21251943
dc.relation.otherNew South Wales Department of Healthen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.