Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDann, Kelly
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T00:46:53Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T00:46:53Z
dc.date.issued2021en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24624
dc.description.abstractMuch of the evidence for morphological decomposition accounts of complex word identification has relied on the masked-priming paradigm. However, morphologically complex words are typically encountered in sentence contexts and processing begins before a word is fixated, when it is in the parafovea. To evaluate whether the single word-identification data generalize to natural reading, Experiment 1 investigated the contribution of morphological structure to the very earliest stages of lexical processing indexed by preview effects during sentence reading in the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm. Preview conditions systematically assessed the impact of prefixed and suffixed nonword previews that manipulated stem and affix overlap, and affix status, against an orthographically legal control baseline. Initial fixations on suffixed target words showed a preview benefit from nonwords that combined the target stem with a legitimate affix, but not with a non-affix, while prefixed targets only benefited from an identical preview. When presented in a masked prime lexical decision task in Experiment 2, the same stimuli yielded equivalent stem priming from suffixed and prefixed primes regardless of affix status, consistent with previous masked priming studies using similar nonword primes. The early effects of morphological structure selectively observed on parafoveal processing of suffixed words are inconsistent with recent non-morphological, position-invariant accounts of embedded stem activation. These results provide the first evidence of morphological parafoveal processing in English and contribute to recent evidence that readers extract a higher level of information from the parafovea during natural reading than was previously assumed.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognitionen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectmasked primingen_AU
dc.subjectparafoveal processingen_AU
dc.subjectmorphologyen_AU
dc.subjecteye movementsen_AU
dc.subjectpsychologyen_AU
dc.titleMorphological preview effects in English are restricted to suffixed wordsen_AU
dc.typePreprinten_AU
dc.subject.asrc17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciencesen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1701 Psychologyen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1702 Cognitive Sciencesen_AU
dc.subject.asrc1799 Other Psychology and Cognitive Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xlm0001029
dc.rights.other© 2021, American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the final, authoritative version of the article. Please do not copy or cite without authors' permission. The final article will be available, upon publication, via its DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001029en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Science::School of Psychologyen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.