Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Sinead
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Josephine
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Lorna
dc.contributor.authorBlythe, Richard
dc.contributor.authorWheate, Nial
dc.contributor.authorDelibegovic, Mirela
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-09T04:16:33Z
dc.date.available2021-02-09T04:16:33Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-07en
dc.identifier.citationInf. Child. Dev, 2014, 23, 67-83.en
dc.identifier.citationInf. Child. Dev, 2014, 23, 67-83.
dc.identifier.citationInf. Child. Dev, 2014, 23, 67-83.
dc.identifier.citationInf. Child. Dev, 2014, 23, 67-83.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24425
dc.description.abstractResearch examining cognition and science learning has focused on workingmemory, but evidence implicates a broader set of executive functions. The current study examined executive functions and learning of biology in young adolescents. Fifty-six participants, aged 12–13 years, completed tasks of working memory (Spatial Working Memory), inhibition (Stop-Signal), attention set-shifting (ID/ED) and planning (Stockings of Cambridge), from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. They also participated in a biology teaching session, practical and assessment on the topic of DNA designed specifically for the current study that measured (a) memory for biology facts taught and (b) understanding of information learned in the practical. Linear regression analysis revealed that planning ability predicted performance on the factual assessment, and both spatial working memory and planning were predictive of performance on the conceptual assessment. The findings suggest that planning ability is important in learning biological facts but that a broader set of executive functions are important for conceptual learning, highlighting the role of executive functions in understanding and applying knowledge about what is learned within science teaching.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonsen
dc.relationThis study was funded by a Royal Society of Edinburgh Crucible grant to: S. Rhodes, R. Blythe, N. Wheate and M. Delibegovic.en
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectCANTABen
dc.titleEvidence for a role of executive functions in learning biologyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc1701 Psychologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/icd.1823
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Healthen
usyd.departmentSchool of Pharmacyen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.