Identification of Microchip Implantation Events for Dogs and Cats in the VetCompass Australia Database
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | McGreevy, Paul | |
dc.contributor.author | Masters, Sophie | |
dc.contributor.author | Richards, Leonie | |
dc.contributor.author | Soares Magalhaes, Ricardo J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peaston, Anne | |
dc.contributor.author | Combs, Martin | |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, Peter J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lloyd, Janice | |
dc.contributor.author | Croton, Catriona | |
dc.contributor.author | Wylie, Claire | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Bethany | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-06T23:30:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-06T23:30:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/24245 | |
dc.description.abstract | In Australia, compulsory microchipping legislation requires that animals are microchipped before sale or prior to 84 days of age (i.e., 12 weeks or 3 months) in the ACT, NSW, QLD and VIC, and by 6 months in WA and TAS. Describing the implementation of microchipping in animals allows the data guardians to identify individual animals presenting to differing veterinary practices over their lifetimes and evaluate compliance with legislation. VetCompass Australia (VCA) collates electronic patient records from primary-care veterinary practices into a database for epidemiological studies. VetCompass is the largest companion animal clinical data repository of its kind in Australia and thereby ideal resource to analyse the microchip data as a permanent unique identifier of an animal. The current study examined the free-text ‘Examination record’ field in the electronic patient records of 1,000 randomly selected dogs and cats in the VCA database. This field may allow identification of the date of microchip implantation, enabling comparison with other date fields in the database, such as date of birth. The study revealed that the median age at implantation for dogs presented as individual patients, rather than among litters, was 74.4 days; significantly lower than for cats (127.0 days, p=0.003). Further exploration into reasons for later microchipping in cats may be useful in aligning common practice with legislative requirements. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | MDPI | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Animals | en_AU |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 | en_AU |
dc.subject | cats | en_AU |
dc.subject | dogs | en_AU |
dc.subject | microchip | en_AU |
dc.subject | strays | en_AU |
dc.subject | VetCompass Australia | en_AU |
dc.title | Identification of Microchip Implantation Events for Dogs and Cats in the VetCompass Australia Database | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 0707 Veterinary Sciences | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ani9070423 | |
dc.relation.arc | LE160100026 | |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::Faculty of Science::Sydney Institute of Veterinary Science | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | University of Melbourne | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | University of Queensland | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | University of Adelaide | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | Murdoch University | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | Charles Sturt University | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | James Cook University | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 9 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 7 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 423 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | Yes | en_AU |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections