Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVergara, Joséen
dc.contributor.authorSkoretz, Stacey A.en
dc.contributor.authorBrodsky, Martin B.en
dc.contributor.authorMiles, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorLangmore, Susan E.en
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Sarahen
dc.contributor.authorSeedat, Jaishikaen
dc.contributor.authorStarmer, Heather M.en
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Leeen
dc.contributor.authorClavé, Pereen
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Susana Vazen
dc.contributor.authorBogaardt, Hansen
dc.contributor.authorMatsuo, Koichiroen
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, Cinthia Madeiraen
dc.contributor.authorMourão, Lucia Figueiredoen
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15
dc.date.available2020-10-15
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23599
dc.description.abstractPurpose Speech-language pathologists are playing a crucial role in the assessment and management of patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Our goal was to synthesize peer-reviewed literature and association guidelines from around the world regarding dysphagia assessment and management for this specific population. Method A review of publications available in the PubMed database and official guidelines of international groups was performed on May 23, 2020. The information was synthesized and categorized into three content areas for swallowing: clinical evaluation, instrumental assessment, and rehabilitation. Results Five publications were identified in the PubMed database. Following title, abstract, and full-text review, only three publications met inclusion criteria: two reviews and one narrative report. Additionally, 19 international guidelines were reviewed. To assess swallowing, a modified clinical evaluation was recommended and only following a risk assessment. Instrumental assessments were often considered aerosol generating, especially transnasal procedures such as endoscopy and manometry. For this reason, many associations recommended that these examinations be performed only when essential and with appropriate personal protective equipment. Guidelines recommended that intervention should focus on compensatory strategies, including bolus modification, maneuvers/postural changes, and therapeutic exercises that can be conducted with physical distancing. Respiratory training devices were not recommended during rehabilitation. Conclusions International associations have provided extensive guidance regarding the level of risk related to the management of dysphagia in this population. To date, there are no scientific papers offering disease and/or recovery profiling for patients with dysphagia and coronavirus disease 2019. As a result, research in this area is urgently needed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleAssessment, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Dysphagia in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2: A Review of the Literature and International Guidelinesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2020_ajslp-20-00163
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.