Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDunn, Hamish Pen_AU
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Kai Zongen_AU
dc.contributor.authorSmyth, James WPen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWeerasinghe, Lakni Sen_AU
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Juliaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorPampapathi, Preethien_AU
dc.contributor.authorKeay, Lisaen_AU
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Timen_AU
dc.contributor.authorVukasovic, Matthewen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Beau Ben_AU
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Nancy Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorBiousse, Valérieen_AU
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Andrew Jen_AU
dc.contributor.authorMcCluskey, Peteren_AU
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Clare Len_AU
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24
dc.date.available2020-09-24
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23431
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of fundus pathology in metropolitan Australian EDs utilising a non-mydriatic fundus photography screening programme. Secondary objectives include diagnostic accuracy among emergency physicians compared to telehealth ophthalmologist review. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study investigating non-mydriatic fundus photography as a new diagnostic test in two tertiary Australian EDs. Consecutive adult patients were enrolled if they presented with headache, focal neurological deficit, visual disturbance or diastolic BP >120 mmHg. Diagnostic agreement was determined using kappa statistics and sensitivity and specificity using a reference standard consensus ophthalmology review. RESULTS: A total of 345 consecutive patients were enrolled among whom 56 (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13-21) had urgent fundus pathology. Agreement between emergency physician and ophthalmic assessment of fundus photographs was 74% (kappa = 0.196, P = 0.001). Emergency physicians had 40% sensitivity (95% CI 27-54) and 82% specificity (95% CI 76-86) for detecting urgent pathology on photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Fundus photography detects a clinically significant proportion of fundus pathology and urgent diagnoses. Telehealth specialist image review is important to detect some important, time-critical illnesses that can be missed in routine care. This offers an accurate alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy that warrants further research in Australian EDs.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_AU
dc.subjectCoronavirusen_AU
dc.titleUsing non?mydriatic fundus photography to detect fundus pathology in Australian metropolitan emergency departments: A prospective prevalence and diagnostic accuracy studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1742-6723.13619


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.