Pandemic vaccine trials: expedite, but don't rush
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Dawson, Angus | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-14 | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/23364 | |
| dc.description.abstract | It has been proposed that the urgency of having a vaccine as a response to SARS-CoV-2 is so great, given the potential health, economic and social benefits that we should override the established steps in the research development process. In this article I argue that whilst there are some opportunities to expedite the production of a vaccine, it is a mistake to rush the research. We should retain the existing structures represented by clear and separate ‘phasing’ of trials. I offer three reasons for this view: the existing phases of trials is morally significant; rushing fails to appropriately weigh all of the relevant risks and benefits and consent is not sufficient for the justification of additional risk. Vaccines have played a central role in global health improvements and we should not endanger such achievements for an apparent short-term gain in response to a pandemic such as SARS-CoV-2. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Other | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | Coronavirus | en |
| dc.title | Pandemic vaccine trials: expedite, but don't rush | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1747016120943730 | |
| usyd.faculty | Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School | en |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections