Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Angusen
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14
dc.date.available2020-09-14
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23364
dc.description.abstractIt has been proposed that the urgency of having a vaccine as a response to SARS-CoV-2 is so great, given the potential health, economic and social benefits that we should override the established steps in the research development process. In this article I argue that whilst there are some opportunities to expedite the production of a vaccine, it is a mistake to rush the research. We should retain the existing structures represented by clear and separate ‘phasing’ of trials. I offer three reasons for this view: the existing phases of trials is morally significant; rushing fails to appropriately weigh all of the relevant risks and benefits and consent is not sufficient for the justification of additional risk. Vaccines have played a central role in global health improvements and we should not endanger such achievements for an apparent short-term gain in response to a pandemic such as SARS-CoV-2.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titlePandemic vaccine trials: expedite, but don't rushen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1747016120943730
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.