Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Ashwinen
dc.contributor.authorMallikarjuna, Reddyen
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Zubareven
dc.contributor.authorUmesh, Kadamen
dc.contributor.authorZhengjie, Limen
dc.contributor.authorChris, Ansteyen
dc.contributor.authorShailesh, Biharien
dc.contributor.authorJumana, Hajien
dc.contributor.authorSubhathra, Karunanithien
dc.contributor.authorKollengode, Ramanathanen
dc.contributor.authorJinghang, Luoen
dc.contributor.authorNeil, Maraen
dc.contributor.authorSaikat, Mitraen
dc.contributor.authorArvind, Rajamanien
dc.contributor.authorFrancesca, Rubulottaen
dc.contributor.authorErik, Svensken
dc.contributor.authorKiran, Shekaren
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-14
dc.date.available2020-08-14
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23091
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical guidelines on infection prevention strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are not comprehensive and are ambiguous may compromise HCWs’ safety. We aimed to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection prevention strategies in HCWs. Methods: A 3-round, web-based, delphi consensus-building process among a diverse group of HCWs and healthcare managers was utilised. We validated the tool by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income. Findings: Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The chosen domains allowed appraisal of guidelines in relation to general characteristics (domain-1), recommendations on engineering (domain-2) and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection prevention, as well as personal protection equipment (PPE) use (domain-3). The appraisal tool performed well across all domains and inter-rater agreement was excellent. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 compared with domains 4-6 and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries. Interpretation: The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Recommendations on engineering aspects of infection prevention, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high quality HCW infection prevention guidelines during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleDevelopment and Validation of Tool to Appraise Guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 Infection Prevention Strategies in Healthcare Workersen
dc.typePreprinten
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.3618322
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.