Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, L
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-01
dc.date.available2008-04-01
dc.date.issued1999-01-01
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, (1999), Vol.50, No.5, 703-720en
dc.identifier.issn0004-9409
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/2260
dc.description.abstractThe extent of genotype and location effects on chemical composition and nutritive value of grains fed to animals was surveyed. The review covered the winter cereals (wheat, barley, oats, and triticale), the summer cereals (sorghum and maize), and the pulses (field pea, lupins, faba beans, and chickpea) when fed to cattle, sheep, poultry, pigs, rats, and mice. The bulk of the literature does not meet the statistical criteria required to differentiate genotype and environment effects. When the criteria were satisfied, significant genotype differences were shown to exist for chemical composition in wheat, barley, triticale, and sorghum, for nutritive value as determined by methods in vitro in wheat, barley, oats, triticale, and sorghum and in vivo for wheat, barley, triticale, sorghum and maize. Valid comparisons across grain species are few, but in vitro gas production ranks wheat > oats > barley. Significant location, year, genotype × location, genotype × year, and genotype × location × year effects were reported for nutritive value for some grains. Wheat feeding trials with poultry indicate that environment can affect apparent metabolisable energy (AME) as much as, if not more than, genotype. A greater range in nutritive value appears to exist in barley than in wheat. The information is unclear in the case of triticale, where despite some reports claiming that grain of this species has high lysine content, the difference does not appear to translate to improved performance in animals. Insufficient studies exist for oats despite it being one of the most widely used on-farm feed grains. No examples could be found of studies with rye. The most thoroughly researched grain has been sorghum, which is principally grown in developed countries for feeding to livestock. Here, some definitive studies have been conducted to define the extent of genotype, location, and genotype × environment interaction effects. Scope exists to enhance the nutritive value of sorghum by breeding through modification of endosperm composition, tannin content, and improved protein digestibility. Variation in endosperm composition in maize due to simply inherited mutations provides the opportunity to improve its nutritive value. This review indicates that before any plant breeding is undertaken for feed grain quality, a better understanding of what determines nutritive value and the relative importance of genotype and environment in modulating these factors is required.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishing, PO Box 1139, Collingwood, Vic. 3066en
dc.rightsThis material is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act, no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be altered, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission from the University of Sydney Library and/or the appropriate author.en
dc.subjectcerealsen
dc.subjectpulsesen
dc.subjectnutritive valueen
dc.subjectnutritionen
dc.subjectdigestibilityen
dc.subjectmetabolisableen
dc.subjectenergyen
dc.subjectchemical compositionen
dc.subjectgrainen
dc.subjectPGLPen
dc.titleGenotype and environment effects on feed grain qualityen
dc.typeArticleen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.