Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHarding, Henryen
dc.contributor.authorBroom, Alexen
dc.contributor.authorBroom, Jenniferen
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18
dc.date.available2020-06-18
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22510
dc.description.abstractThe transmission behaviour of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still being defined. It is likely that it is transmitted predominantly by droplets and direct contact and it is possible that there is at least opportunistic airborne transmission. In order to protect healthcare staff adequately is necessary that we establish whether aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) increase the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Where we do not have evidence relating to SARS-CoV-2, guidelines for safely conducting these procedures should consider what risk procedures would have of transmitting related pathogens. Currently there is very little evidence detailing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 associated with any specific procedures. Regarding aerosol generating procedures and respiratory pathogens in general, there is still a large knowledge gap that will leave clinicians unsure what risk they are putting themselves in when offering these procedures. This review aimed to summarise the evidence (and gaps in evidence) around AGPs and SARS-CoV-2.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titleAerosol generating procedures and infective risk to healthcare workers: SARS-CoV-2 - the limits of the evidenceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhin.2020.05.037
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.