Preventing prejudice by preserving the spirit of mental health legislation during the COVID-19 national emergency.
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Ouliaris, Calina | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Sheahan, Linda | en |
| dc.contributor.author | George, Duncan | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-18 | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/22506 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: The COVID-19 national emergency activates legislative powers that allow a proportional infringement upon individual liberties. We canvas the complex legal landscape governing mental health consumers in this climate, highlight ethical considerations in application of the law and offer a simple algorithm to navigate this space. Conclusion: In times of emergency, it is crucial that we uphold the safeguards embodied within mental health legislation to prevent prejudicial treatment of mental health consumers. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.rights | Other | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | en |
| dc.subject | Coronavirus | en |
| dc.title | Preventing prejudice by preserving the spirit of mental health legislation during the COVID-19 national emergency. | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1039856220928865 | |
| usyd.faculty | Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School | en |
Associated file/s
There are no files associated with this item.
Associated collections