Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOuliaris, Calinaen
dc.contributor.authorSheahan, Lindaen
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Duncanen
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-18
dc.date.available2020-06-18
dc.date.issued2020en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22506
dc.description.abstractObjective: The COVID-19 national emergency activates legislative powers that allow a proportional infringement upon individual liberties. We canvas the complex legal landscape governing mental health consumers in this climate, highlight ethical considerations in application of the law and offer a simple algorithm to navigate this space. Conclusion: In times of emergency, it is crucial that we uphold the safeguards embodied within mental health legislation to prevent prejudicial treatment of mental health consumers.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.titlePreventing prejudice by preserving the spirit of mental health legislation during the COVID-19 national emergency.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1039856220928865
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.