Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorony, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Michaela
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffery, Kirsten J
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Angela C
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-26
dc.date.available2020-05-26
dc.date.issued2015-02-04
dc.identifier.citationMorony, S, Flynn M, McCaffery K , Jansen J, Webster AC. Readability of written materials for chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review. American Journal of Kidney Diseases 2015;65(6):842-50en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22350
dc.description.abstractBackground: The "average" patient has a literacy level of US grade 8 (age 13-14 years), but this may be lower for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current guidelines suggest that patient education materials should be pitched at a literacy level of around 5th grade (age 10-11 years). This study aims to evaluate the readability of written materials targeted at patients with CKD. Study design: Systematic review. Setting & population: Patient information materials aimed at adults with CKD and written in English. Search strategy & sources: Patient education materials designed to be printed and read, sourced from practices in Australia and online at all known websites run by relevant international CKD organizations during March 2014. Analytical approach: Quantitative analysis of readability using Lexile Analyzer and Flesch-Kincaid tools. Results: We analyzed 80 materials. Both Lexile Analyzer and Flesch-Kincaid analyses suggested that most materials required a minimum of grade 9 (age 14-15 years) schooling to read them. Only 5% of materials were pitched at the recommended level (grade 5). Limitations: Readability formulas have inherent limitations and do not account for visual information. We did not consider other media through which patients with CKD may access information. Although the study covered materials from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, all non-Internet materials were sourced locally, and it is possible that some international paper-based materials were missed. Generalizability may be limited due to exclusion of non-English materials. Conclusions: These findings suggest that patient information materials aimed at patients with CKD are pitched above the average patient's literacy level. This issue is compounded by cognitive decline in patients with CKD, who may have lower literacy than the average patient. It suggests that information providers need to consider their audience more carefully when preparing patient information materials, including user testing with a low-literacy patient population.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.titleReadability of Written Materials for CKD Patients: A Systematic Reviewen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.025
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.