Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMudge, David W.
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Angela C.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, David W.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20
dc.date.available2020-05-20
dc.date.issued2016-05-20
dc.identifier.citationMudge D, Webster A, Johnson D. Opponent's comments. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 2016; 31(6), 885-886.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22324
dc.description.abstractOpponent's commentsen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.titleMeta-analysis – the case for Rebuttalen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ndt/gfw092a
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen
dc.rights.otherThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation] following peer review. The version of record [Mudge D, Webster A, Johnson D. Opponent's comments. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 2016; 31(6), 885-886.] is available online at: https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article/31/6/885/1752442 [https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw092a].en
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.