Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrouse, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorChitty, Kate
dc.contributor.authorIorfino, Frank
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Django
dc.contributor.authorNichles, Alissa
dc.contributor.authorZmicerevska, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorTickell, Ashleigh
dc.contributor.authorLee, Rico
dc.contributor.authorNaismith, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorScott, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorScott, Jan
dc.contributor.authorHermens, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorHickie, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27
dc.date.available2020-04-27
dc.date.issued2020-03-19
dc.identifier.citationBJPsych Open. 2020 Mar 19;6(2):e31. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.12.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/22114
dc.description.abstractBackground Neurocognitive impairments robustly predict functional outcome. However, heterogeneity in neurocognition is common within diagnostic groups, and data-driven analyses reveal homogeneous neurocognitive subgroups cutting across diagnostic boundaries. Aims To determine whether data-driven neurocognitive subgroups of young people with emerging mental disorders are associated with 3-year functional course. Method Model-based cluster analysis was applied to neurocognitive test scores across nine domains from 629 young people accessing mental health clinics. Cluster groups were compared on demographic, clinical and substance-use measures. Mixed-effects models explored associations between cluster-group membership and socio-occupational functioning (using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale) over 3 years, adjusted for gender, premorbid IQ, level of education, depressive, positive, negative and manic symptoms, and diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder. Results Cluster analysis of neurocognitive test scores derived three subgroups described as ‘normal range’ (n = 243, 38.6%), ‘intermediate impairment’ (n = 252, 40.1%), and ‘global impairment’ (n = 134, 21.3%). The major mental disorder categories (depressive, anxiety, bipolar, psychotic and other) were represented in each neurocognitive subgroup. The global impairment subgroup had lower functioning for 3 years of follow-up; however, neither the global impairment (B = 0.26, 95% CI −0.67 to 1.20; P = 0.581) or intermediate impairment (B = 0.46, 95% CI −0.26 to 1.19; P = 0.211) subgroups differed from the normal range subgroup in their rate of change in functioning over time. Conclusions Neurocognitive impairment may follow a continuum of severity across the major syndrome-based mental disorders, with data-driven neurocognitive subgroups predictive of functional course. Of note, the global impairment subgroup had longstanding functional impairment despite continuing engagement with clinical services.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherBJPsych Openen
dc.relationNHMRC grant 1136259en
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1136259en
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectyouth mental healthen
dc.subjectpsychiatryen
dc.subjectsocial functionen
dc.subjectoccupational functionen
dc.subjectfunctioningen
dc.subjectpsychosocial functioningen
dc.subjectdepressionen
dc.subjectpsychosisen
dc.subjectbipolaren
dc.subjectanxietyen
dc.subjectneurocognitionen
dc.subjectneuropsychologyen
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectcluster analysisen
dc.titleTransdiagnostic neurocognitive subgroups and functional course in young people with emerging mental disorders: a cohort study.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical Schoolen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.