Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Franklin, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Willis, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Rogers, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor-Burke, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, L | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-10 | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-10 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-01-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Franklin, M., Lewis, S., Willis, K., Bourke-Taylor, H., & Smith, L. (2018). Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Chronic Illness, 14(2), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317710082 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/21818 | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Objective To review studies examining the experience of self-management support in patient–provider interactions and the shaping of goals through interactions. Methods We undertook a systematic review and thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature. We searched six databases (2004–2015) for published studies on the provision of self-management support in one-to-one, face-to-face, patient–provider interactions for obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with 14 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Results Themes identified from studies were (1) dominance of a traditional model of care, encompassing the provision of generic information, exclusion of the psychosocial and temporal nature of interactions and (2) a context of individual responsibility and accountability, encompassing self-management as patients’ responsibility and adherence, accountability and the attribution of blame. Interactions were constrained by consultation times, patient self-blame and guilt, desire for autonomy and beliefs about what constitutes ‘effective’ self-management. Discussion Encounters were oriented towards a traditional model of care delivery and this limited opportunity for collaboration. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals remain in a position of authority, limiting opportunities for control to be shared with patients and shared understandings of social context to be developed. | en_AU |
dc.description.sponsorship | Australian Research Council (DP150101406). | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
dc.publisher | SAGE | en_AU |
dc.relation | This research was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP150101406) | en_AU |
dc.subject | self management support | en_AU |
dc.subject | self management | en_AU |
dc.subject | Chronic conditions | en_AU |
dc.subject | patient professional interactions | en_AU |
dc.subject | goal setting | en_AU |
dc.subject | systematic review | en_AU |
dc.subject | thematic analysis | en_AU |
dc.title | Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | Health | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | Medicine | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1742395317710082 | |
dc.type.pubtype | Post-print | en_AU |
dc.relation.arc | DP150101406 |
Associated file/s
Associated collections