Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJoffe, Michelle Robyn
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16
dc.date.available2019-09-16
dc.date.issued2019-06-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/21123
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To secure a cellophane band around a vein with either three or four layers with a polymer or titanium hemostatic clip of either medium or medium-large size, at 25% or 50% vessel attenuation, and observe the conditions under which the construct is more likely to fail and the pressure at failure. Study design: Ex-vivo mechanical evaluation Methods: Cellophane bands composed of three or four layers were applied around a cadaveric external jugular vein (EJV) to create 25% or 50% attenuation. These bands were secured with Polymer Locking Ligation Clip (PLLC) medium/medium-large, or Titanium Ligation Clip (TLC) medium/medium-large. Sterile saline 0.9% was instilled into the lumen of the EJV until a pressure of 100mmHg was reached. Failure mechanism and luminal pressure at failure were compared between groups. Results: Medium clips were significantly more likely to fail than medium-large clips (P= <0.001). Three-layer cellophane bands were significantly more likely to fail than four-layer bands (P=0.003). Failure also occurred at significantly lower pressures with a 3-layered cellophane band compared to a four-layered band (P=0.027). There was no significant difference between the failure rate of the cellophane band construct secured with PLLC or TLC, (P = 0.635) or with 25% vs 50% attenuation (P=0.780). The four-layer cellophane band, was 4.1 times less likely to fail (CI 1.6-10.2) than the three-layer cellophane band. Conclusion and clinical relevance: One, medium sized clip either PLLC or TLC is sufficient to withstand physiological forces when securing a cellophane band around a vein at up to 50% attenuation. A cellophane band with four layers is less likely to result in clip slippage and failure compared to a cellophane band with three layers. The recommendation would be to secure a four-layer cellophane band with a medium sized PLLC if follow-up CT scans may be required.en_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
dc.subjectportosystemic shunten_AU
dc.subjectcanineen_AU
dc.subjectcellophane banden_AU
dc.subjectveterinary surgeryen_AU
dc.subjectattenuationen_AU
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of different methods for securing cellophane bands for portosystemic shunt attenuation and factors that affect construct failureen_AU
dc.typeThesisen_AU
dc.type.thesisMasters by Researchen_AU
usyd.facultyFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Scienceen_AU
usyd.degreeMaster of Veterinary Clinical Studies M.Vet.Clin.Stud.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.