Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColagiuri, Ben
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Veronica F
dc.contributor.authorColloca, Luana
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T05:58:18Z
dc.date.available2019-01-21T05:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationColagiuri, B., Quinn, V. F., & Colloca, L. (2015). Nocebo Hyperalgesia, Partial Reinforcement, and Extinction. Journal of Pain, 16(10), 995-1004.en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19820
dc.description.abstractMany studies have found evidence of conditioning-induced nocebo hyperalgesia. However, these studies have exclusively involved continuous reinforcement schedules. Thus, it is currently unknown whether nocebo hyperalgesia can result following partial reinforcement. We tested this using electrodermal pain stimulation in healthy volunteers. Undergraduates (n=135) received nocebo treatment under the guise of a hyperalgesic. Participants were randomly allocated to continuous reinforcement (CRF), partial reinforcement (PRF), or control (no conditioning). Conditioning involved surreptitiously increasing pain stimulation on nocebo trials relative to control trials. During training, the CRF group always had the nocebo paired with the surreptitious pain increase, whereas the PRF group only experienced the increase on 62.5% of nocebo trials. In the test phase, pain stimulation was equivalent across nocebo and control trials. Partial reinforcement was sufficient to induce nocebo hyperalgesia, however, this was weaker than continuous reinforcement. Interestingly, nocebo hyperalgesia failed to extinguish irrespective of the training schedule. Additional assessment of expectancies indicated strong concordance between these and nocebo hyperalgesia. Overall, these findings suggest that once established, nocebo hyperalgesia may be difficult to disrupt. As such, partial reinforcement may be one method of reducing the intensity of nocebo hyperalgesia in the clinic, which may be particularly important given its persistence. Perspectives: This study provides novel evidence that partial reinforcement results in weaker nocebo hyperalgesia than continuous reinforcement and that nocebo hyperalgesia fails to extinguish, irrespective of the training schedule. As a result, partial reinforcement may serve as a method for reducing the intensity of nocebo hyperalgesia in the clinic.en_AU
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier Publishingen_AU
dc.relationARC DP150104026en_AU
dc.titleNocebo Hyperalgesia, Partial Reinforcement, and Extinctionen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doidoi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.06.012
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record