Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.contributor.authorGhinea, N
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.contributor.authorZalcberg, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06
dc.date.available2018-12-06
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLipworth W, Ghinea N, Kerridge I, Zalcberg J. Clearing the air: towards agreement about access to high cost cancer medicines. Annals of Oncology. 10.1093/annonc/mdy459en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19631
dc.description.abstractOncologists have an important role to play in debates about access to high cost cancer medicines. But in order for oncologists to be able to fulfil this role they need to have a solid understanding of the contexts of debates about access to high cost medicines, of the parameters that everyone can agree upon, and of the points of disagreement that need to be resolved. In this article, we offer a conceptual framework that oncologists (and other stakeholders) could use to guide more focused, systematic and ultimately mutually beneficial discussions about the subsidization of high cost cancer medicines.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherOxford Journalsen
dc.relationNHMRC Career Development Fellowship (APP1036539); NHMRC Project Grant (APP1080673)en
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectAccess to medicinesen
dc.subjectHealth technology assessmenten
dc.subjectResource allocationen
dc.titleClearing the air: towards agreement about access to high cost cancer medicinesen
dc.title.alternativeIndustry corner: perspectives and controversiesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc2201 Applied ethicsen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Sciencesen
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen
dc.description.embargo2019-10-18
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.