The science that dares not speak its name
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Gabriel Leung | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-10-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/18931 | |
dc.description | In the current anti-elitist climate where the postmodern fluidity of truth and facts is taken to an unprecedented level, I posit that the underpinnings to this evaluative science would require a fundamental rethink if it were to survive the present existential challenge. I illustrate the evolution of the field with examples in mammography screening and diabetes care and conclude with a possible set of transformative responses for the future. | en_AU |
dc.description.abstract | Technology assessment, broadly defined as the evaluation and monitoring of relative effectiveness and cost in health care delivery, began with Archie Cochrane's Effectiveness and Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services | en_AU |
dc.description.sponsorship | S T Lee | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
dc.subject | Technology assessment | en_AU |
dc.subject | mammography screening | en_AU |
dc.title | The science that dares not speak its name | en_AU |
dc.type | Presentation | en_AU |
dc.contributor.department | Menzies Centre for Health Policy | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections