Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMason, P
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05
dc.date.available2018-06-05
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMason P, Kerridge I, Lipworth W. 2017. The global in global health is not a given. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Health. 96(4):767-769en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/18324
dc.description.abstractThe process of globalization is commonly espoused as a means for promoting global health. Efforts to ‘go global’ can, however, easily go awry as a result of lack of attention to local social, economic and political contexts and/or as a result of commercial and political imperatives that allow local populations to be exploited. Critical analysis of the processes of globalization is necessary in order to better understand the local particularities of global projects and confront challenges more transparently. We illustrate the potential adverse impacts of globalization in the global health setting, through examination of international tuberculosis control, global mental health, and the establishment of transnational biobank networksen
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)en
dc.relationNHMRC Career Development Fellowship (APP1036539) NHMRC Project Grant APP1083980en
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en
dc.subjectBiobanksen
dc.subjectTissue banksen
dc.subjectGlobalisationen
dc.titleThe global in global health is not a given.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrc2201 Applied ethicsen
dc.subject.asrc1117 Public Health and Health Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi0.4269/ajtmh.16-0791en
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.