|Title:||Declarations, Accusations and Judgement: Examining conflict of interest discourses as performative speech-acts.|
Conflicts of interest
|Citation:||Mayes C, Lipworth W, Kerridge I. 2016. Declarations, Accusations and Judgement: Examining conflict of interest discourses as performative speech-acts. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy. Published online: 22 April 2016; available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11019-016-9703-8|
|Abstract:||Concerns over conflicts of interest (COI) in academic research and medical practice continue to provoke a great deal of discussion. What is most obvious in this discourse is that when COIs are declared, or perceived to exist in others, there is a focus on both the descriptive question of whether there is a COI and, subsequently, the normative question of whether it is good, bad or neutral. We contend, however, that in addition to the descriptive and normative, COI declarations and accusations can be understood as performatives. In this article, we apply J.L. Austin’s performative speech-act theory to COI discourses and illustrate how this works using a contemporary case study of COI in biomedical publishing. We argue that using Austin’s theory of performative speech-acts serves to highlight the social arrangements and role of authorities in COI discourse and so provides a rich framework to examine declarations, accusations and judgements of COI that often arise in the context of biomedical research and practice. Keywords J.L. Austin Conflicts of interest Discourse analysis Research ethics|
|Type of Work:||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Papers and Publications. Sydney Health Ethics|
|Declarations-Accusations-and-Judgement_PP-2016.pdf||389.33 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.