Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLane, Andrew Stuart
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-18
dc.date.available2017-05-18
dc.date.issued2015-03-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/16744
dc.description.abstractOpen disclosure is a policy stating doctors should apologise for errors, discussing them with the harmed parties. The aim of this thesis was to explore the current practice of open disclosure by junior doctors, and develop an educational framework that ensured reflective clinical practice. I conducted a Phenomenological study of medical interns involved in open disclosure in three parts. Firstly, ten interns were interviewed illuminating their clinical experiences of open disclosure. Eight medical students then underwent a hi-fidelity simulation session followed by focus-group discussions. Finally, the eight medical students were interviewed during their intern year, illuminating their experiences of open disclosure and their reflection on the simulation session. Data was coded and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Analysis of part one demonstrated three superordinate-themes; Rationalisation of medical error; Culture of medical error; Apology in practice. Analysis of part two demonstrated two superordinate-themes; Identifying learning needs; Learning to say sorry. Analysis of part three demonstrated two superordinate-themes; Retaining learning into practice; Planning future practice. Medical interns appeared to lack important elements in their knowledge frames, which made them more prone to making errors. Their knowledge frames and actions demonstrated conscious incompetence associated with rationalisation, and unconscious incompetence associated with cognitive dissonance. The simulation education session gave medical students the psychological safety to take risks in their learning and develop a growth mindset and cognitive resilience. The role of an expert facilitator was vital in providing the optimal learning environment. A learning model developed from the data suggested the presence of a cognitive trait, which was labelled ‘readiness to apologise’, meaning that the interns were; aware of the need to apologise; aware of the rationale to apologise; and aware of the want to apologise. Mentorship and guidance by educators is required to inspire learners to develop cognitive frameworks such as intellectual humility, a growth mindset, and situational awareness. This means that learners will reflect with the right people, at the right time, in the right manner.en_AU
dc.rightsThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
dc.subjectopen disclosureen_AU
dc.subjectmedication erroren_AU
dc.subjectsimulationen_AU
dc.subjectcritical reflectionen_AU
dc.subjectcompetency matrixen_AU
dc.subjectcontextualized reflective competenceen_AU
dc.titleSaying Sorry: Junior doctors’ experiences of open disclosure following medication error. A phenomenological study using medical simulationen_AU
dc.typeThesisen_AU
dc.date.valid2017-01-01en_AU
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
usyd.facultySydney Medical Schoolen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.