Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFord, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-04
dc.date.available2017-01-04
dc.date.issued2010-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMichele Ford (2010) A victor's history: a comparative analysis of the labour historiography of Indonesia's New Order, Labor History, 51:4, 523-541en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/16112
dc.description.abstractSome observers have identified a common pattern in developing countries whereby unions are transformed from a political force valued for their contribution to the struggle for independence to a state-sponsored ‘tool of development’. A less well-explored question concerns the harnessing of labour historiography to justify such transitions. As this article shows, Suharto’s New Order (1966–98) undertook a conscious and purposeful rewriting of Indonesian labour history in support of a single vehicle of labour representation organized around a narrative of the dangers of political unionism and designed to control and harness the industrial workforce in the name of economic development.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_AU
dc.rightsThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis as: Michele Ford (2010) A victor's history: a comparative analysis of the labour historiography of Indonesia's New Order, Labor History, 51:4, 523-541, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0023656X.2010.528991en_AU
dc.subjecthistoryen_AU
dc.subjectIndonesiaen_AU
dc.subjectlabour historiographyen_AU
dc.subjectlabour movementen_AU
dc.subjectNew Orderen_AU
dc.subjecttrade unionsen_AU
dc.titleA Victor's History: A Comparative Analysis of the Labour Historiography of Indonesia's New Orderen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2010.528991
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.