Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDyer, G.
dc.contributor.authorGilroy, N.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, L.
dc.contributor.authorHogg, M.
dc.contributor.authorBrice, L.
dc.contributor.authorKabir, M.
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, M.
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, S.R.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, J.
dc.contributor.authorHertzberg, M.
dc.contributor.authorKwan, J.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, G.
dc.contributor.authorTan, J.
dc.contributor.authorWard, C
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-03
dc.date.available2017-01-03
dc.date.issued2015-12-01
dc.identifier.citationDyer, G., Gilroy, N., Brown, L., Hogg, M., Brice, L., Kabir, M., Greenwood, M., Larsen, S.R., Moore, J., Hertzberg, M., Kwan, J., Huang, G., Tan, J., Ward, C., Kerridge, I. What They Want: Inclusion of Bone Marrow Transplantation Survivor Preference in the Development of Models of Care for Long-Term Health in Sydney, Australia. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2015 22 ( 4 ) pp. 731 - 743 . Dec 30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.12.019en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/16066
dc.description.abstractHighlights •We surveyed 441 allogeneic bone marrow transplantation survivors about their long-term care preference •Of the respondents, 44.9% indicated that they would prefer long-term follow-up with their transplantation physician alone •We found that 74% preferred care with the transplantation center and satellite clinics or telemedicine •The survey revealed that 53% indicated a preference for a single site location for long-term follow-up •Income, education status, and sexual morbidity were factors influencing care preference Abstract Four hundred forty-one adult allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors participated in a cross-sectional survey to assess long-term follow-up (LTFU) model of care preference. Survey instruments included the Sydney Post BMT Survey, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-BMT, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21, the Chronic GVHD Activity Assessment—Patient Self Report (Form B), the Lee Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale and the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory. We found most BMT survivors (74%) would prefer LTFU with their transplantation physicians alone or in combination with transplantation center–linked services (satellite clinics or telemedicine) Over one-quarter indicated a preference for receiving comprehensive post-transplantation care in a “satellite” clinic staffed by their BMT team situated closer to their place of residence, with higher income, higher educational level, and sexual morbidity being significant social factors influencing this preference. Regular exercise was reported less often in those who preferred telemedicine, which may reflect reduced mobility. The factor most strongly associated with a preference for transplantation center follow-up was the severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Full- and part-time work were negatively associated with transplantation center follow-up, possibly implying decreased dependency on the center and some return to normalcy. This study is the first to explore the preferences of BMT survivors for long-term post-transplantation care. These data provides the basis for LTFU model of care development and health service reform consistent with the preferences of BMT survivors.en
dc.description.sponsorshipfunded by the New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation Blood and Marrow Transplant Network and supported by the Northern Blood Research Centre.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjectAllogeneic transplantationen
dc.subjectSurvivor preferenceen
dc.subjectModel of careen
dc.subjectLong-term follow-upen
dc.subjectSurvivorshipen
dc.titleWhat they want: Inclusion of Blood and Marrow Transplant Survivor Preference in the Development of Models of Care for Long-Term Health in Sydney, Australiaen
dc.typeArticleen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.