Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMooney-Somers, Julie
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, A
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-03
dc.date.available2017-01-03
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMooney-Somers, J & Olsen, A (published online November 2016) Ethical review and qualitative research competence: guidance for reviewers and applicants. Research Ethics. doi:10.1177/1747016116677636en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/16063
dc.description.abstractIt is difficult to consider, describe or address the ethical issues particular to qualitative research without experience and understanding of the technicalities of qualitative methodologies. The Australian National Statement on the Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans charges researchers with a responsibility to demonstrate that they have the appropriate experience, qualifications and competence for their proposed research. Ethical review committees have the responsibility to judge claimed research competence. This paper provides practical guidance to researchers and review committees on using formal qualifications and training, explicit claims of competence, and markers of in/competence to assess qualitative research competence. Keywords: Qualitative research; ethical review; research ethics; competence; methodologyen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherSageen_AU
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_AU
dc.subjectethical reviewen_AU
dc.subjectresearch ethicsen_AU
dc.subjectcompetenceen_AU
dc.subjectmethodologyen_AU
dc.titleEthical review and qualitative research competence: guidance for reviewers and applicants.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.