Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25
dc.date.available2016-08-25
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLipworth W, Kerridge I, Consent to Biobank Research: Facing Up to the Challenge of Globalization (open peer commentary), American journal of Bioethics, 2015;15(9):58-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062179en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/15560
dc.description.abstractThere is broad agreement that open-ended consent to research involving banked specimens and associated data is morally justifiable. Importantly, this approach is justifiable if, and only if, clear mechanisms are in place for 1.ethical and scientific oversight, and 2. ongoing communication with tissue donors. The problem for those in favour of open-ended consent for research is that biobanks have the greatest potential as resources for translational research if they are networked - both nationally and internationally. And as networks, by definition, require that custodianship of samples be relinquished at some point, this makes it difficult, if not impossible, to guarantee sound ethical and scientific oversight and to promise ongoing communication with donors. Unless the reality of globalisation is addressed head on, even the most thoughtful ethical proposals, such as that put forward in this article, will soon be obsolete.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipNHMRCen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_AU
dc.subjecttissue donorsen_AU
dc.subjectethicalen_AU
dc.subjectconsenten_AU
dc.subjectbiobank researchen_AU
dc.subjectglobalisationen_AU
dc.subjectethicsen_AU
dc.titleConsent to Biobank Research: Facing Up to the Challenge of Globalisationen_AU
dc.typeArticle, Letteren_AU
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.