Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, W
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, I
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25
dc.date.available2016-08-25
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifier.citationLipworth W, Kerridge I, Consent to Biobank Research: Facing Up to the Challenge of Globalization (open peer commentary), American journal of Bioethics, 2015;15(9):58-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062179en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/15560
dc.description.abstractThere is broad agreement that open-ended consent to research involving banked specimens and associated data is morally justifiable. Importantly, this approach is justifiable if, and only if, clear mechanisms are in place for 1.ethical and scientific oversight, and 2. ongoing communication with tissue donors. The problem for those in favour of open-ended consent for research is that biobanks have the greatest potential as resources for translational research if they are networked - both nationally and internationally. And as networks, by definition, require that custodianship of samples be relinquished at some point, this makes it difficult, if not impossible, to guarantee sound ethical and scientific oversight and to promise ongoing communication with donors. Unless the reality of globalisation is addressed head on, even the most thoughtful ethical proposals, such as that put forward in this article, will soon be obsolete.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNHMRCen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.rightsOther
dc.subjecttissue donorsen
dc.subjectethicalen
dc.subjectconsenten
dc.subjectbiobank researchen
dc.subjectglobalisationen
dc.subjectethicsen
dc.titleConsent to Biobank Research: Facing Up to the Challenge of Globalisationen
dc.typeArticle, Letteren
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.