Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKing, MT
dc.contributor.authorBell, ML
dc.contributor.authorCosta, D
dc.contributor.authorButow, PN
dc.contributor.authorOh, B
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01
dc.date.available2016-08-01
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.identifier.citationKing MT, Bell ML, Costa D, Butow P, Oh B. The Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer-General (FACT-G) differ in responsiveness, relative efficiency, and therefore required sample size. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014, 67(1), 100-7.en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/15444
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relationJournal of Clinical Epidemiologyen_AU
dc.rightsThis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(1), 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.019en_AU
dc.titleThe Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer - General (FACT-G) differ in responsiveness, relative efficiency, and therefore required sample sizeen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.019
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.