Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Angus
dc.contributor.authorSim, Julius
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-04
dc.date.available2016-04-04
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.identifier.citationDawson, A., & Sim, J. The nature and ethics of natural experiments. Journal of medical ethics. 2015; 41:848-853 doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102254en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/14626
dc.description.abstractNatural experiments are an important methodology often used to answer research questions that would, otherwise, be impossible to address, or employed because of ethical concerns about the use of randomisation to interventions that carry known risks. The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) recently produced an extremely useful document discussing the nature and significance of natural experiments within medical and public health research. In this paper, however, we suggest that the MRC document's definition of the term ‘natural experiment’ is insufficiently precise. In response, we offer a taxonomy of different types of natural experiments and related methods, and explore the ethical implications of these different types. We argue that while the ethical issues that may arise within natural experiments in relation to risks of harm or informed consent may differ from those within the randomised controlled trial, they are not thereby less pressing. The implications of the argument are explored and recommendations made for those involved in research governance.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_AU
dc.titleThe nature and ethics of natural experimentsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.