Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||A Multi-dimensional Examination of Strategic Competence in the Lexico-grammar Test Performance of Chinese EFL University Students|
|Authors: ||Bi, Nick Zhiwei|
|Issue Date: ||10-Mar-2015|
|Publisher: ||University of Sydney.|
Faculty of Education and Social Work.
|Abstract: ||Despite the importance of strategic competence theory in language assessment, only a few studies have set out to validate it using empirical data. Phakiti (2007) points out that while human cognitive processing is subtle and highly dependent on context, little is known about the influence of strategic competence on test performance over time.
This thesis reports on two empirical studies to address these issues. Study One is a large scale cross-sectional study (N=416) and Study Two a longitudinal one in which three lexico-grammatical tests and various sets of strategy use questionnaires were given to Chinese EFL students over 3 months (1-month interval; N=519). The cross-sectional study aimed to reveal the nature of strategic competence and provide a baseline model, while the longitudinal investigation aimed to assess and evaluate issues of ‘performance consistency’ (Chapelle, 1998), including both lexico-grammatical and strategic abilities, over time through a multi-trait multi-method (MTMM) approach (Campbell & Fiske, 1959), using structural equation modeling (SEM).
Study One found that the nature of strategic competence is highly complex. Strategic competence was found to be a metacognitive function of human cognition associated with general strategic awareness and online strategic processing. Metacognitive awareness as a long-term mental process in L2 test-takers’ mind constantly manages and regulates their use of language in test-taking. Also, strategic competence does not directly contribute to language test performance since it acts as a cluster of strategic processing, which individually has a direct/indirect positive effect on test performance. The results of Study Two suggested that test-takers’ cognitive strategic processing used in tests became more stable and automatic, ie. test-takers might transition from being conscious to being unconscious of their mental processing. Additionally, strategic behaviours accounted for more when test-takers faced unfamiliar and difficult test tasks. However, even when the difficulty of the test tasks was similar, after test-takers’ strategic processing became automatic the impact of strategic thinking and behaviour accounted for less or little in their actual performances.|
|Access Level: ||Access is restricted to staff and students of the University of Sydney . UniKey credentials are required. Non university access may be obtained by visiting the University of Sydney Library.|
|Rights and Permissions: ||The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.|
|Type of Work: ||PhD Doctorate|
|Type of Publication: ||Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D.|
|Appears in Collections:||Sydney Digital Theses (University of Sydney Access only)|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
|bi_nz_thesis.pdf||Thesis||3.21 MB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.