Enacting Internal Coherence as a Path to Quality in Qualitative Inquiry

Access status:

Open Access

Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Carter, SM
dc.date.accessioned	2015-02-04
dc.date.available	2015-02-04
dc.date.issued	2010-01-01
dc.identifier.citation	Carter SM. Enacting Internal Coherence as a Path to Quality in Qualitative Inquiry. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (eds). Researching Practice: A Discourse on Qualitative Methodologies Vol 2 Practice, Education, Work and Society Series. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers 2010	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789460911835/BP000017.xml
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2123/12691
dc.description.abstract	In this chapter, I am going to make an argument about how to judge quality and do quality in qualitative research, I’m a little trepidatious taking this on: it’s an old subject and many great authors have written on it elegantly (just a few examples: Angen, 2000; Barbour, 2001; Flick, 2007; Mason, 2002; Seale, 1999). People come to blows over the quality of qualitative research, perhaps because it goes to the question of whether it’s worth doing research at all. Questions about quality are a big deal.	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	Sense	en
dc.rights	Other
dc.title	Enacting Internal Coherence as a Path to Quality in Qualitative Inquiry	en
dc.type	Book chapter	en
dc.type.pubtype	Publisher's version	en
usyd.faculty	Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics