Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarter, SM
dc.contributor.authorRitchie, JE
dc.contributor.authorSainsbury, P
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-12
dc.date.available2015-01-12
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifier.citationCarter SM, Ritchie JE and Sainsbury P. Doing good qualitative research in public health: not as easy as it looks. NSW Public Health Bulletin 2009;20(7–8):1-6en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/12535
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we discuss qualitative research for public health professionals. Quality matters in qualitative research, but the principles by which it is judged are critically different from those used to judge epidemiology. Compared to quantitative research, good quality qualitative studies serve different aims, answer distinct research questions and have their own logic for sampling, data collection and analysis. There is, however, no need for antagonism between qualitative research and epidemiology; the two are complementary. With theoretical and methodological guidance from experienced qualitative researchers, public health professionals can learn how to make the most of qualitative research for themselves.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherCSIROen_AU
dc.titleDoing good qualitative research in public health: not as easy as it looks.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.