On the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interest
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Mayes, C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-12 | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-01-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mayes, C. ‘On the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interest’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9: 2, 2012, pp. 217 – 218. Commentary. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/12530 | |
| dc.description | commentary | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Comment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott, published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 8(4): 389–391. In calling for a sociological analysis of conflicts of interest through a postmodern lens, Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott open multiple avenues of inquiry. As suggested, a postmodern perspective may serve to disrupt modernist notions of objective science, pure knowledge, and human progress implied by COI policies and regulation. However, rather than following this path, I contend that modernist notions of the individual implied by COI governance require critical attention. In this brief response to the case presented, I examine the individual–institution relation in COI governance. Keywords: Primary interests, Secondary interests, Institutional interests, Social self | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en |
| dc.rights | Other | |
| dc.title | On the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interest | en |
| dc.type | Article, Letter | en |
| dc.type.pubtype | Author accepted manuscript | en |
| usyd.faculty | Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics |
Associated file/s
Associated collections