Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMayes, C
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-12
dc.date.available2015-01-12
dc.date.issued2012-01-01
dc.identifier.citationMayes, C. ‘On the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interest’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 9: 2, 2012, pp. 217 – 218. Commentary.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/12530
dc.descriptioncommentaryen
dc.description.abstractComment on “Toward a Sociology of Conflict of Interest in Medical Research” by Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott, published in Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 8(4): 389–391. In calling for a sociological analysis of conflicts of interest through a postmodern lens, Sarah Winch and Michael Sinnott open multiple avenues of inquiry. As suggested, a postmodern perspective may serve to disrupt modernist notions of objective science, pure knowledge, and human progress implied by COI policies and regulation. However, rather than following this path, I contend that modernist notions of the individual implied by COI governance require critical attention. In this brief response to the case presented, I examine the individual–institution relation in COI governance. Keywords: Primary interests, Secondary interests, Institutional interests, Social selfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.rightsOther
dc.titleOn the Importance of the Institution and Social Self in a Sociology of Conflicts of Interesten
dc.typeArticle, Letteren
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.